Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 241

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Medical students' learning of anatomy: memorisation, understanding and visualisation

Open access
Pandey, Priti, Zimitat, Craig·2007·Medical Education

Abstract

Introduction There is much subjective discussion, but few empirical data that explore how students approach the learning of anatomy. Aims Students' perceptions of successful approaches to learning anatomy were correlated with their own approaches to learning, quality of learning and grades. Methods First‐year medical students ( n = 97) studying anatomy at an Australian university completed an online survey including a version of the Study Process Questionnaire (SPQ) that measures approaches to learning. The quality of students' written assessment was rated using the Structure of Observed Learning Outcomes (SOLO) taxonomy. Final examination data were used for correlation with approaches and quality of learning. Results Students perceived successful learning of anatomy as hard work, involving various combinations of memorisation, understanding and visualisation. Students' surface approach (SA) scores (mean 30 ± 3.4) and deep approach (DA) scores (mean 31 ± 4.2) reflected the use of both memorisation and understanding as key learning strategies in anatomy. There were significant correlations between SOLO ratings and DA scores ( r = 0.24, P < 0.01), between SA scores and final grades ( r = − 0.30, P < 0.01) and between SOLO ratings and final grades ( r = 0.61, P < 0.01) in the subject. Conclusions Approaches to learning correlate positively with the quality of learning. Successful learning of anatomy requires a balance between memorisation with understanding and visualisation. Interrelationships between these three strategies for learning anatomy in medicine and other disciplines require further investigation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02643.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 241

Metadata

Authors
Pandey, P., & Zimitat, C.
Venue
Medical Education
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-12-12
Volume
41
Issue
1
Pages
7-14
ISSN
  • 0308-0110 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2923
OpenAlex
W2065011405
Cited by
241
References
1
FWCI
4.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Medical students' learning of anatomy: memorisation, understanding and visualisation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02643.x
The paper
Pandey, P., & Zimitat, C. (2007). Medical students' learning of anatomy: memorisation, understanding and visualisation. Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02643.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.