Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 619

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Experience‐based learning: a model linking the processes and outcomes of medical students' workplace learning

Dornan, Tim, Boshuizen, Henny, King, Nigel, Scherpbier, Albert·2007·Medical Education

Abstract

Objective To develop a model linking the processes and outcomes of workplace learning. Methods We synthesised a model from grounded theory analysis of group discussions before and after experimental strengthening of medical students' workplace learning. The research was conducted within a problem‐based clinical curriculum with little early workplace experience, involving 24 junior and 12 senior medical students. Results To reach their ultimate goal of helping patients, medical students must develop 2 qualities. One is practical competence; the other is a state of mind that includes confidence, motivation and a sense of professional identity. These 2 qualities reinforce one another. The core process of clinical workplace learning involves ‘participation in practice’, which evolves along a spectrum from passive observation to performance. Practitioners help students participate by being both supportive and challenging. The presentation of clear learning objectives and continuous periods of attachment that are as personal to the student(s) and practitioner(s) as possible promote workplace learning. Conclusions The core condition for clinical workplace learning is ‘supported participation’, the various outcomes of which are mutually reinforcing and also reinforce students' ability to participate in further practice. This synthesis has 2 important implications for contemporary medical education: any reduction in medical students' participation in clinical practice that results from the patient safety agenda and expanded numbers of medical students is likely to have an adverse effect on learning, and the construct of ‘self‐directed learning’, which our respondents too often found synonymous with ‘lack of support’, should be applied with very great caution to medical students' learning in clinical workplaces.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02652.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 619

Metadata

Authors
Dornan, T., Boshuizen, H., King, N., & Scherpbier, A.
Venue
Medical Education
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-12-20
Volume
41
Issue
1
Pages
84-91
ISSN
  • 0308-0110 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2923
OpenAlex
W2114031600
Cited by
619
References
2
FWCI
7.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experience‐based learning: a model linking the processes and outcomes of medical students' workplace learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02652.x
The paper
Dornan, T., Boshuizen, H., King, N., & Scherpbier, A. (2007). Experience‐based learning: a model linking the processes and outcomes of medical students' workplace learning. Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02652.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.