The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Experience‐based learning: a model linking the processes and outcomes of medical students' workplace learning
Abstract
Objective To develop a model linking the processes and outcomes of workplace learning. Methods We synthesised a model from grounded theory analysis of group discussions before and after experimental strengthening of medical students' workplace learning. The research was conducted within a problem‐based clinical curriculum with little early workplace experience, involving 24 junior and 12 senior medical students. Results To reach their ultimate goal of helping patients, medical students must develop 2 qualities. One is practical competence; the other is a state of mind that includes confidence, motivation and a sense of professional identity. These 2 qualities reinforce one another. The core process of clinical workplace learning involves ‘participation in practice’, which evolves along a spectrum from passive observation to performance. Practitioners help students participate by being both supportive and challenging. The presentation of clear learning objectives and continuous periods of attachment that are as personal to the student(s) and practitioner(s) as possible promote workplace learning. Conclusions The core condition for clinical workplace learning is ‘supported participation’, the various outcomes of which are mutually reinforcing and also reinforce students' ability to participate in further practice. This synthesis has 2 important implications for contemporary medical education: any reduction in medical students' participation in clinical practice that results from the patient safety agenda and expanded numbers of medical students is likely to have an adverse effect on learning, and the construct of ‘self‐directed learning’, which our respondents too often found synonymous with ‘lack of support’, should be applied with very great caution to medical students' learning in clinical workplaces.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Barry Issenberg, S., Mcgaghie, W. C., Petrusa, E. R., Lee Gordon, D., & Scalese, R. J. (2005) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/01421590500046924 · Cited by 3,966
Students' opinions about their preparation for clinical practice
Prince, K. J. A. H., Boshuizen, H. P. A., Van Der Vleuten, C. P. M., & Scherpbier, A. J. J. A. (2005) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02207.x · Cited by 301
Self-citation
Cited by
Self-Directed Learning in Problem-Based Learning and its Relationships with Self-Regulated Learning
Loyens, S. M. M., Magda, J., & Rikers, R. M. J. P. (2008) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-008-9082-7 · Cited by 882
Experiential learning: AMEE Guide No. 63
Yardley, S., Teunissen, P. W., & Dornan, T. (2012) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.3109/0142159x.2012.650741 · Cited by 639
Self-citationConceptual frameworks to illuminate and magnify
Bordage, G. (2009) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03295.x · Cited by 479
The Case for Use of Entrustable Professional Activities in Undergraduate Medical Education
Chen, H. C., van den Broek, W. E. S., & ten Cate, O. (2015) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000000586 · Cited by 431
Birden, H., Glass, N., Wilson, I., Harrison, M., Usherwood, T., & Nass, D. (2013) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.3109/0142159x.2013.789132 · Cited by 306
Metadata
- Authors
- Dornan, T., Boshuizen, H., King, N., & Scherpbier, A.
- Venue
- Medical Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-12-20
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 84-91
- ISSN
- 0308-0110 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2923
- OpenAlex
- W2114031600
- Cited by
- 619
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experience‐based learning: a model linking the processes and outcomes of medical students' workplace learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02652.x
- The paper
- Dornan, T., Boshuizen, H., King, N., & Scherpbier, A. (2007). Experience‐based learning: a model linking the processes and outcomes of medical students' workplace learning. Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02652.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.