The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analysis of population genetic structure with RAPD markers
Abstract
Recent advances in the application of the polymerase chain reaction make it possible to score individuals at a large number of loci. The RAPD (random amplified polymorphic DNA) method is one such technique that has attracted widespread interest. The analysis of population structure with RAPD data is hampered by the lack of complete genotypic information resulting from dominance, since this enhances the sampling variance associated with single loci as well as induces bias in parameter estimation. We present estimators for several population‐genetic parameters (gene and genotype frequencies, within‐ and between‐population heterozygosities, degree of inbreeding and population subdivision, and degree of individual relatedness) along with expressions for their sampling variances. Although completely unbiased estimators do not appear to be possible with RAPDs, several steps are suggested that will insure that the bias in parameter estimates is negligible. To achieve the same degree of statistical power, on the order of 2 to 10 times more individuals need to be sampled per locus when dominant markers are relied upon, as compared to codominant (RFLP, isozyme) markers. Moreover, to avoid bias in parameter estimation, the marker alleles for most of these loci should be in relatively low frequency. Due to the need for pruning loci with low‐frequency null alleles, more loci also need to be sampled with RAPDs than with more conventional markers, and some problems of bias cannot be completely eliminated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SAMPLING VARIANCES OF HETEROZYGOSITY AND GENETIC DISTANCE
Nei, M., & Roychoudhury, A. K. (1974) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/76.2.379 · Cited by 1,641
Cited by
New insights from fine‐scale spatial genetic structure analyses in plant populations
Vekemans, X., & Hardy, O. J. (2004) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.2004.02076.x · Cited by 1,313
Bryant, D., Bouckaert, R., Felsenstein, J., Rosenberg, N. A., & RoyChoudhury, A. (2012) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/mss086 · Cited by 965
Contributions of PCR-Based Methods to Plant Systematics and Evolutionary Biology
Wolfe, A. D., & Liston, A. (1998) · Molecular Systematics of Plants II · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-5419-6_2 · Cited by 411
The Population Genetics of Fungi: Tools and Techniques
McDonald, B. A. (1997) · Phytopathology® · doi:10.1094/phyto.1997.87.4.448 · Cited by 402
A Quantitative-Genetic Perspective on Conservation Issues
Lynch, M. (1996) · Conservation Genetics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2504-9_15 · Cited by 403
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- LYNCH, M., & MILLIGAN, B. G.
- Venue
- Molecular Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-04
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 91-99
- ISSN
- 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-294X
- OpenAlex
- W1986260377
- Cited by
- 2,018
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis of population genetic structure with RAPD markers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-294x.1994.tb00109.x
- The paper
- LYNCH, M., & MILLIGAN, B. G. (1994). Analysis of population genetic structure with RAPD markers. Molecular Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294x.1994.tb00109.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.