The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Microsatellite analysis of population structure in Canadian polar bears
Abstract
Attempts to study the genetic population structure of large mammals are often hampered by the low levels of genetic variation observed in these species. Polar bears have particularly low levels of genetic variation with the result that their genetic population structure has been intractable. We describe the use of eight hypervariable microsatellite loci to study the genetic relationships between four Canadian polar bear populations: the northern Beaufort Sea, southern Beaufort Sea, western Hudson Bay, and Davis Strait ‐ Labrador Sea. These markers detected considerable genetic variation, with average heterozygosity near 60% within each population. Interpopulation differences in allele frequency distribution were significant between all pairs of populations, including two adjacent populations in the Beaufort Sea. Measures of genetic distance reflect the geographic distribution of populations, but also suggest patterns of gene flow which are not obvious from geography and may reflect movement patterns of these animals. Distribution of variation is sufficiently different between the Beaufort Sea populations and the two more eastern ones that the region of origin for a given sample can be predicted based on its expected genotype frequency using an assignment test. These data indicate that gene flow between local populations is restricted despite the long‐distance seasonal movements undertaken by polar bears.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SAMPLING VARIANCES OF HETEROZYGOSITY AND GENETIC DISTANCE
Nei, M., & Roychoudhury, A. K. (1974) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/76.2.379 · Cited by 1,641
Cited by
Landscape genetics: combining landscape ecology and population genetics
Manel, S., Schwartz, M. K., Luikart, G., & Taberlet, P. (2003) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(03)00008-9 · Cited by 1,859
Reliable genotyping of samples with very low DNA quantities using PCR
Taberlet, P. (1996) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/24.16.3189 · Cited by 1,491
SNPs in ecology, evolution and conservation
Morin, P. A., Luikart, G., Wayne, R. K., & the SNP workshop group (2004) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.01.009 · Cited by 1,080
Dispersal in Freshwater Invertebrates
Bilton, D. T., Freeland, J. R., & Okamura, B. (2001) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.114016 · Cited by 947
Genetic structure of the world’s polar bear populations
Paetkau, D., Amstrup, S. C., Born, E. W., Calvert, W., Derocher, A. E., Garner, G. W., Messier, F., Stirling, I., Taylor, M. K., Wiig, Ø., et al. (1999) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.1999.00733.x · Cited by 262
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- PAETKAU, D., CALVERT, W., STIRLING, I., & STROBECK, C.
- Venue
- Molecular Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-06
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 347-354
- ISSN
- 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-294X
- OpenAlex
- W2072076632
- Cited by
- 2,024
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microsatellite analysis of population structure in Canadian polar bears. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-294x.1995.tb00227.x
- The paper
- PAETKAU, D., CALVERT, W., STIRLING, I., & STROBECK, C. (1995). Microsatellite analysis of population structure in Canadian polar bears. Molecular Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294x.1995.tb00227.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.