Cited by 285

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Population Graphs: the graph theoretic shape of genetic structure

Dyer, Rodney J., Nason, John D.·2004·Molecular Ecology

Abstract

Patterns of intraspecific genetic variation result from interactions among both historical and contemporary evolutionary processes. Traditionally, population geneticists have used methods such as F ‐statistics, pairwise isolation by distance models, spatial autocorrelation and coalescent models to analyse this variation and to gain insight about causal evolutionary processes. Here we introduce a novel approach (Population Graphs) that focuses on the analysis of marker‐based population genetic data within a graph theoretic framework. This method can be used to estimate traditional population genetic summary statistics, but its primary focus is on characterizing the complex topology resulting from historical and contemporary genetic interactions among populations. We introduce the application of Population Graphs by examining the range‐wide population genetic structure of a Sonoran Desert cactus ( Lophocereus schottii ). With this data set, we evaluate hypotheses regarding historical vicariance, isolation by distance, population‐level assignment and the importance of specific populations to species‐wide genetic connectivity. We close by discussing the applicability of Population Graphs for addressing a wide range of population genetic and phylogeographical problems.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-294x.2004.02177.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Network-based connectivity statistics are often dependent on an assumed graph-theoretic model and are often computer resource-limited as larger areas are considered.

    “Network-based representations can be analyzed to derive meaningful connectivity statistics [22]–[25], though these are often dependent on an assumed graph-theoretic model (e.g., complete graph, minimum planar graph) [19] and are often computer resource-limited as larger areas are considered [26].”

Citations

Cites

  • Random Graphs

    Bollobás, B. (2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511814068 · Cited by 2,639 · cited 3×

    “A graph ( G ) is a mathematical mapping of two disjoint sets, a set of nodes ( V ) and a set of edges ( E ), and is denoted as G = { V, E } (Bollobás 2001).”
    Background

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. 10.1103/RevModPhys.74.47 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Avise JC, 2000, PhyloGeographyraphy: the History and Formation of Species, 10.2307/j.ctv1nzfgj7 · DOI
  3. 10.1006/tpbi.1999.1447 · DOI
  4. 10.1073/pnas.081068098 · DOI
  5. Box GEP, 1987, Empirical Model‐Building and Response Surfaces.
  6. Box GEP, 1978, Statistics for Experimenters: an Introduction to Design, Data Analysis, and Model Building
  7. Case TJ, 2002, A New Island Biogeography of the Sea of Cortez, 10.1093/oso/9780195133462.001.0001 · DOI
  8. 10.1093/genetics/153.4.1989 · DOI
  9. Cox JM, 1996, Multivariate Dependencies: Models, Analysis, and Interpretation
  10. 10.2307/2992369 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/S0169-5347(00)01998-4 · DOI
  12. 10.2307/2528966 · DOI
  13. Draper NR, 1981, Applied Regression Analysis
  14. 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2002.01650.x · DOI
  15. 10.1007/978-1-4684-0481-4 · DOI
  16. 10.2307/2656651 · DOI
  17. 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01186.x · DOI
  18. 10.1016/S0169-5347(97)01098-7 · DOI
  19. 10.1093/biomet/53.3-4.325 · DOI
  20. 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2001.01202.x · DOI
  21. Johnson RA, 1992, Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis
  22. Kempthorne O, 1969, An Introduction to Genetic Statistics
  23. 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2002.01410.x · DOI
  24. 10.2307/2992184 · DOI
  25. 10.1093/genetics/117.2.273 · DOI
  26. 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00823.x · DOI
  27. Manly BFJ, 1997, Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology
  28. 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb00146.x · DOI
  29. 10.1086/282771 · DOI
  30. 10.1093/genetics/89.3.583 · DOI
  31. Peñalba MC, 1998, Cambios de vegetacíon y clima en Baja California, México, durante los últimos 20 000 años, Geología Del Noroeste, 2, 21
  32. Rhodes OEJ, 1996, Population Dynamics in Ecological Space and Time
  33. 10.1016/0169-5347(96)10032-X · DOI
  34. 10.1073/pnas.250413397 · DOI
  35. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02568.x · DOI
  36. 10.1146/annurev.es.16.110185.002141 · DOI
  37. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1993.tb01215.x · DOI
  38. 10.1086/283925 · DOI
  39. Sokal RR, 1995, Biometry
  40. Sork VL, 2001, Landscape approaches to historical and contemporary gene flow in plants, Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 14, 219, 10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01585-7 · DOI
  41. 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00289.x · DOI
  42. 10.1006/qres.1994.1011 · DOI
  43. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1984.tb05657.x · DOI
  44. 10.1007/BF00120649 · DOI
  45. Whittaker J, 1990, Graphical Methods in Applied Multivariate Statistics.
  46. 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1949.tb02451.x · DOI
  47. 10.1086/375120 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Dyer, R. J., & Nason, J. D.
Venue
Molecular Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-04-22
Volume
13
Issue
7
Pages
1713-1727
ISSN
  • 0962-1083
  • 1365-294X
Cited by
285
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review