The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Is genome size influenced by colonization of new environments in dipteran species?
Abstract
Genome size differences are usually attributed to the amplification and deletion of various repeated DNA sequences, including transposable elements (TEs). Because environmental changes may promote modifications in the amount of these repeated sequences, it has been postulated that when a species colonizes new environments this could be followed by an increase in its genome size. We tested this hypothesis by estimating the genome size of geographically distinct populations of Drosophila ananassae,Drosophila malerkotliana,Drosophila melanogaster,Drosophila simulans,Drosophila subobscura,and Zaprionus indianus,all of which have known colonization capacities. There was no strong statistical differences between continents for most species. However, we found that populations of D. melanogaster from east Africa have smaller genomes than more recent populations. For species in which colonization is a recent event, the differences between genome sizes do not thus seem to be related to colonization history. These findings suggest either that genome size is seldom modified in a significant way during colonization or that it takes time for genome size of invading species to change significantly.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Human Alu element retrotransposition induced by genotoxic stress
Hagan, C. R., Sheffield, R. F., & Rudin, C. M. (2003) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1259 · Cited by 137
Cited by
Polyploidy and angiosperm diversification
Soltis, D. E., Albert, V. A., Leebens‐Mack, J., Bell, C. D., Paterson, A. H., Zheng, C., Sankoff, D., de Pamphilis, C. W., Wall, P. K., & Soltis, P. S. (2009) · American Journal of Botany · doi:10.3732/ajb.0800079 · Cited by 1,257
Gene duplication and evolutionary novelty in plants
Flagel, L. E., & Wendel, J. F. (2009) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02923.x · Cited by 969
From 2R to 3R: evidence for a fish-specific genome duplication (FSGD)
Meyer, A., & Van de Peer, Y. (2005) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.20293 · Cited by 945
The polyploidy revolution then…and now: Stebbins revisited
Soltis, D. E., Visger, C. J., & Soltis, P. S. (2014) · American Journal of Botany · doi:10.3732/ajb.1400178 · Cited by 517
The genome of flax (Linum usitatissimum) assembled de novo from short shotgun sequence reads
Wang, Z., Hobson, N., Galindo, L., Zhu, S., Shi, D., McDill, J., Yang, L., Hawkins, S., Neutelings, G., Datla, R., et al. (2012) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2012.05093.x · Cited by 448
Metadata
- Authors
- NARDON, C., DECELIERE, G., LŒVENBRUCK, C., WEISS, M., VIEIRA, C., & BIÉMONT, C.
- Venue
- Molecular Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-02-07
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 869-878
- ISSN
- 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-294X
- OpenAlex
- W2148323280
- Cited by
- 326
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 25.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Is genome size influenced by colonization of new environments in dipteran species? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2005.02457.x
- The paper
- NARDON, C., DECELIERE, G., LŒVENBRUCK, C., WEISS, M., VIEIRA, C., & BIÉMONT, C. (2005). Is genome size influenced by colonization of new environments in dipteran species? Molecular Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2005.02457.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.