The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Birdsong and anthropogenic noise: implications and applications for conservation
Abstract
The dramatic increase in human activities all over the world has caused, on an evolutionary time scale, a sudden rise in especially low‐pitched noise levels. Ambient noise may be detrimental to birds through direct stress, masking of predator arrival or associated alarm calls, and by interference of acoustic signals in general. Two of the most important functions of avian acoustic signals are territory defence and mate attraction. Both of these functions are hampered when signal efficiency is reduced through rising noise levels, resulting in direct negative fitness consequences. Many bird species are less abundant near highways and studies are becoming available on reduced reproductive success in noisy territories. Urbanization typically leads to homogenization of bird communities over large geographical ranges. We review current evidence for whether and how anthropogenic noise plays a role in these patterns of decline in diversity and density. We also provide details of a case study on great tits (Parus major), a successful urban species. Great tits show features that other species may lack and make them unsuitable for city life. We hypothesize that behavioural plasticity in singing behaviour may allow species more time to adapt to human‐altered environments and we address the potential for microevolutionary changes and urban speciation in European blackbirds (Turdus merula). We conclude by providing an overview of mitigating measures available to abate noise levels that are degrading bird breeding areas. Bird conservationists probably gain most by realizing that birds and humans often benefit from the same or only slightly modified measures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kronfeld-Schor (2013) · doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.2821 · Cited by 174
Cited by
Scaling up from gardens: biodiversity conservation in urban environments.
Goddard, M. A., Dougill, A. J., & Benton, T. G. (2010) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.07.016 · Cited by 1,595
What is soundscape ecology? An introduction and overview of an emerging new science
Pijanowski, B. C., Farina, A., Gage, S. H., Dumyahn, S. L., & Krause, B. L. (2011) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10980-011-9600-8 · Cited by 730
Noise Pollution Changes Avian Communities and Species Interactions
Francis, C. D., Ortega, C. P., & Cruz, A. (2009) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2009.06.052 · Cited by 686
Behavioural responses to human‐induced environmental change
Tuomainen, U., & Candolin, U. (2011) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.2010.00164.x · Cited by 675
Kight, C. R., & Swaddle, J. P. (2011) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01664.x · Cited by 622
Metadata
- Authors
- SLABBEKOORN, H., & RIPMEESTER, E. A. P.
- Venue
- Molecular Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-09-03
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 72-83
- ISSN
- 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-294X
- OpenAlex
- W2049452681
- Cited by
- 653
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Birdsong and anthropogenic noise: implications and applications for conservation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2007.03487.x
- The paper
- SLABBEKOORN, H., & RIPMEESTER, E. A. P. (2008). Birdsong and anthropogenic noise: implications and applications for conservation. Molecular Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2007.03487.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.