Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 362

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ultrasequencing of the meiofaunal biosphere: practice, pitfalls and promises

Open access
CREER, S., FONSECA, V. G., PORAZINSKA, D. L., GIBLIN‐DAVIS, R. M., SUNG, W., POWER, D. M., PACKER, M., CARVALHO, G. R., BLAXTER, M. L., LAMBSHEAD, P. J. D., THOMAS, W. K.·2010·Molecular Ecology

Abstract

Biodiversity assessment is the key to understanding the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning, but there is a well‐acknowledged biodiversity identification gap related to eukaryotic meiofaunal organisms. Meiofaunal identification is confounded by the small size of taxa, morphological convergence and intraspecific variation. However, the most important restricting factor in meiofaunal ecological research is the mismatch between diversity and the number of taxonomists that are able to simultaneously identify and catalogue meiofaunal diversity. Accordingly, a molecular operational taxonomic unit (MOTU)‐based approach has been advocated for en mass meiofaunal biodiversity assessment, but it has been restricted by the lack of throughput afforded by chain termination sequencing. Contemporary pyrosequencing offers a solution to this problem in the form of environmental metagenetic analyses, but this represents a novel field of biodiversity assessment. Here, we provide an overview of meiofaunal metagenetic analyses, ranging from sample preservation and DNA extraction to PCR, sequencing and the bioinformatic interrogation of multiple, independent samples using 454 Roche sequencing platforms. We report two examples of environmental metagenetic nuclear small subunit 18S (nSSU) analyses of marine and tropical rainforest habitats and provide critical appraisals of the level of putative recombinant DNA molecules (chimeras) in metagenetic data sets. Following stringent quality control measures, environmental metagenetic analyses achieve MOTU formation across the eukaryote domain of life at a fraction of the time and cost of traditional approaches. The effectiveness of Roche 454 sequencing brings substantial advantages to studies aiming to elucidate the molecular genetic richness of not only meiofaunal, but also all complex eukaryotic communities.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-294x.2009.04473.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 362

Metadata

Authors
CREER, S., FONSECA, V. G., PORAZINSKA, D. L., GIBLIN‐DAVIS, R. M., SUNG, W., POWER, D. M., PACKER, M., CARVALHO, G. R., BLAXTER, M. L., LAMBSHEAD, P. J. D., & THOMAS, W. K.
Venue
Molecular Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-02-10
Volume
19
Issue
s1
Pages
4-20
ISSN
  • 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-294X
OpenAlex
W2115000471
Cited by
362
References
2
FWCI
22.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ultrasequencing of the meiofaunal biosphere: practice, pitfalls and promises. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2009.04473.x
The paper
CREER, S., FONSECA, V. G., PORAZINSKA, D. L., GIBLIN‐DAVIS, R. M., SUNG, W., POWER, D. M., PACKER, M., CARVALHO, G. R., BLAXTER, M. L., LAMBSHEAD, P. J. D., & THOMAS, W. K. (2010). Ultrasequencing of the meiofaunal biosphere: practice, pitfalls and promises. Molecular Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2009.04473.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.