The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Species delimitation in fungal endophyte diversity studies and its implications in ecological and biogeographic inferences
Abstract
The estimation of species diversity in fungal endophyte communities is based either on species counts or on the assignment of operational taxonomic units (OTUs). Consequently, the application of different species recognition criteria affects not only diversity estimates but also the ecological hypotheses that arise from those observations. The main objective of the study was to examine how the choice and number of genetic markers and species delimitation criteria influence biodiversity estimates. Here, we compare approaches to defining species boundaries in three dominant species complexes of tropical endophytes, specially Colletotrichum gloeosporioides agg.,Pestalotiopsis microspora agg. and Trichoderma harzianum agg., from two Amazonian trees:Hevea brasiliensis and H. guianensis. Molecular tools were used to describe and compare the diversity of the different assemblages. Multilocus phylogenetic analyses [gpd, internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and tef1] and modern techniques for phylogenetic species delimitation were overlaid with ecological data to recognize putative species or OTUs. The results demonstrate that ITS alone generally underestimates the number of species predicted by other nuclear loci. These results question the use of ITS and arbitrary divergence thresholds for species delimitation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mayr, E. (1963) · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674865327 · Cited by 10,175
Taxon sampling and the accuracy of phylogenetic analyses
(2008) · Journal of Systematics and Evolution · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1002.2008.08016 · Cited by 553
A Phylogenetic Evaluation of Whether Endophytes Become Saprotrophs at Host Senescence
Promputtha, I., Lumyong, S., Dhanasekaran, V., McKenzie, E. H. C., Hyde, K. D., & Jeewon, R. (2007) · Microbial Ecology · doi:10.1007/s00248-006-9117-x · Cited by 412
Cited by
Colletotrichum – current status and future directions
Cannon, P. F., Damm, U., Johnston, P. R., & Weir, B. S. (2012) · Studies in Mycology · doi:10.3114/sim0014 · Cited by 1,105
Fungal community analysis by high‐throughput sequencing of amplified markers – a user's guide
Lindahl, B. D., Nilsson, R. H., Tedersoo, L., Abarenkov, K., Carlsen, T., Kjøller, R., Kõljalg, U., Pennanen, T., Rosendahl, S., Stenlid, J., et al. (2013) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.12243 · Cited by 892
The Colletotrichum boninense species complex
Damm, U., Cannon, P. F., Woudenberg, J. H. C., Johnston, P. R., Weir, B. S., Tan, Y. P., Shivas, R. G., & Crous, P. W. (2012) · Studies in Mycology · doi:10.3114/sim0002 · Cited by 485
Insights into the genus Diaporthe: phylogenetic species delimitation in the D. eres species complex
Udayanga, D., Castlebury, L. A., Rossman, A. Y., Chukeatirote, E., & Hyde, K. D. (2014) · Fungal Diversity · doi:10.1007/s13225-014-0297-2 · Cited by 279
Endophytes and their role in phytoremediation
Li, H.-Y., Wei, D.-Q., Shen, M., & Zhou, Z.-P. (2012) · Fungal Diversity · doi:10.1007/s13225-012-0165-x · Cited by 267
Metadata
- Authors
- GAZIS, R., REHNER, S., & CHAVERRI, P.
- Venue
- Molecular Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-05-09
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 3001-3013
- ISSN
- 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-294X
- OpenAlex
- W1857955679
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 10.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Species delimitation in fungal endophyte diversity studies and its implications in ecological and biogeographic inferences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2011.05110.x
- The paper
- GAZIS, R., REHNER, S., & CHAVERRI, P. (2011). Species delimitation in fungal endophyte diversity studies and its implications in ecological and biogeographic inferences. Molecular Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2011.05110.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.