The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Soil sampling and isolation of extracellular DNA from large amount of starting material suitable for metabarcoding studies
Abstract
DNA metabarcoding refers to the DNA‐based identification of multiple species from a single complex and degraded environmental sample. We developed new sampling and extraction protocols suitable for DNA metabarcoding analyses targeting soil extracellular DNA. The proposed sampling protocol has been designed to reduce, as much as possible, the influence of local heterogeneity by processing a large amount of soil resulting from the mixing of many different cores. The DNA extraction is based on the use of saturated phosphate buffer. The sampling and extraction protocols were validated first by analysing plant DNA from a set of 12 plots corresponding to four plant communities in alpine meadows, and, second, by conducting pilot experiments on fungi and earthworms. The results of the validation experiments clearly demonstrated that sound biological information can be retrieved when following these sampling and extraction procedures. Such a protocol can be implemented at any time of the year without any preliminary knowledge of specific types of organisms during the sampling. It offers the opportunity to analyse all groups of organisms using a single sampling/extraction procedure and opens the possibility to fully standardize biodiversity surveys.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hajibabaei, M., Shokralla, S., Zhou, X., Singer, G. A. C., & Baird, D. J. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017497 · Cited by 584
Cited by
Environmental DNA – An emerging tool in conservation for monitoring past and present biodiversity
Thomsen, P. F., & Willerslev, E. (2015) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2014.11.019 · Cited by 2,082
Ancient and modern environmental DNA
Pedersen, M. W., Overballe-Petersen, S., Ermini, L., Sarkissian, C. D., Haile, J., Hellstrom, M., Spens, J., Thomsen, P. F., Bohmann, K., Cappellini, E., et al. (2015) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0383 · Cited by 329
Metabarcoding vs. morphological identification to assess diatom diversity in environmental studies
Zimmermann, J., Glöckner, G., Jahn, R., Enke, N., & Gemeinholzer, B. (2015) · Molecular Ecology Resources · doi:10.1111/1755-0998.12336 · Cited by 317
Manure-based biogas fermentation residues – friend or foe of soil fertility?
Insam, H., Gómez-Brandón, M., & Ascher, J. (2015) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.02.006 · Cited by 321
Qiu, L., Wu, J., Qian, Y., Nafees, M., Zhang, J., Du, W., Yin, Y., & Guo, H. (2021) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126022 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- TABERLET, P., PRUD’HOMME, S. M., CAMPIONE, E., ROY, J., MIQUEL, C., SHEHZAD, W., GIELLY, L., RIOUX, D., CHOLER, P., CLÉMENT, J., MELODELIMA, C., POMPANON, F., & COISSAC, E.
- Venue
- Molecular Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-02-02
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1816-1820
- ISSN
- 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-294X
- OpenAlex
- W2161763884
- Cited by
- 353
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.