The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Highly similar microbial communities are shared among related and trophically similar ant species
Abstract
Ants dominate many terrestrial ecosystems, yet we know little about their nutritional physiology and ecology. While traditionally viewed as predators and scavengers, recent isotopic studies revealed that many dominant ant species are functional herbivores. As with other insects with nitrogen‐poor diets, it is hypothesized that these ants rely on symbiotic bacteria for nutritional supplementation. In this study, we used cloning and 16S sequencing to further characterize the bacterial flora of several herbivorous ants, while also examining the beta diversity of bacterial communities within and between ant species from different trophic levels. Through estimating phylogenetic overlap between these communities, we tested the hypothesis that ecologically or phylogenetically similar groups of ants harbor similar microbial flora. Our findings reveal: (i) clear differences in bacterial communities harbored by predatory and herbivorous ants; (ii) notable similarities among communities from distantly related herbivorous ants and (iii) similar communities shared by different predatory army ant species. Focusing on one herbivorous ant tribe, the Cephalotini, we detected five major bacterial taxa that likely represent the core microbiota. Metabolic functions of bacterial relatives suggest that these microbes may play roles in fixing, recycling, or upgrading nitrogen. Overall, our findings reveal that similar microbial communities are harbored by ants from similar trophic niches and, to a greater extent, by related ants from the same colonies, species, genera, and tribes. These trends hint at coevolved histories between ants and microbes, suggesting new possibilities for roles of bacteria in the evolution of both herbivores and carnivores from the ant family Formicidae.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models
Stamatakis, A. (2006) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl446 · Cited by 15,582
Greengenes, a Chimera-Checked 16S rRNA Gene Database and Workbench Compatible with ARB
DeSantis, T. Z., Hugenholtz, P., Larsen, N., Rojas, M., Brodie, E. L., Keller, K., Huber, T., Dalevi, D., Hu, P., & Andersen, G. L. (2006) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.03006-05 · Cited by 10,891
Toward Automatic Reconstruction of a Highly Resolved Tree of Life
Ciccarelli, F. D., Doerks, T., von Mering, C., Creevey, C. J., Snel, B., & Bork, P. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1123061 · Cited by 1,663
Cited by
The gut microbiota of insects – diversity in structure and function
Engel, P., & Moran, N. A. (2013) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/1574-6976.12025 · Cited by 2,595
Convergence of gut microbiomes in myrmecophagous mammals
Delsuc, F., Metcalf, J. L., Wegener Parfrey, L., Song, S. J., González, A., & Knight, R. (2014) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.12501 · Cited by 347
Coon, K. L., Brown, M. R., & Strand, M. R. (2016) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.13877 · Cited by 346
Comparative Gut Microbiota of 59 Neotropical Bird Species
Hird, S. M., Sánchez, C., Carstens, B. C., & Brumfield, R. T. (2015) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2015.01403 · Cited by 332
Anderson, K. E., Sheehan, T. H., Mott, B. M., Maes, P., Snyder, L., Schwan, M. R., Walton, A., Jones, B. M., & Corby-Harris, V. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0083125 · Cited by 318
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- ANDERSON, K. E., RUSSELL, J. A., MOREAU, C. S., KAUTZ, S., SULLAM, K. E., HU, Y., BASINGER, U., MOTT, B. M., BUCK, N., & WHEELER, D. E.
- Venue
- Molecular Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-01-25
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2282-2296
- ISSN
- 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-294X
- OpenAlex
- W2132962075
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Highly similar microbial communities are shared among related and trophically similar ant species. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2011.05464.x
- The paper
- ANDERSON, K. E., RUSSELL, J. A., MOREAU, C. S., KAUTZ, S., SULLAM, K. E., HU, Y., BASINGER, U., MOTT, B. M., BUCK, N., & WHEELER, D. E. (2012). Highly similar microbial communities are shared among related and trophically similar ant species. Molecular Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2011.05464.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.