Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 296

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

DNA from soil mirrors plant taxonomic and growth form diversity

Open access
YOCCOZ, N. G., BRÅTHEN, K. A., GIELLY, L., HAILE, J., EDWARDS, M. E., GOSLAR, T., Von STEDINGK, H., BRYSTING, A. K., COISSAC, E., POMPANON, F., SØNSTEBØ, J. H., MIQUEL, C., VALENTINI, A., De BELLO, F., CHAVE, J., THUILLER, W., WINCKER, P., CRUAUD, C., GAVORY, F., RASMUSSEN, M., GILBERT, M. T. P., ORLANDO, L., BROCHMANN, C., WILLERSLEV, E., TABERLET, P.·2012·Molecular Ecology

Abstract

Ecosystems across the globe are threatened by climate change and human activities. New rapid survey approaches for monitoring biodiversity would greatly advance assessment and understanding of these threats. Taking advantage of next‐generation DNA sequencing, we tested an approach we call metabarcoding: high‐throughput and simultaneous taxa identification based on a very short (usually <100 base pairs) but informative DNA fragment. Short DNA fragments allow the use of degraded DNA from environmental samples. All analyses included amplification using plant‐specific versatile primers, sequencing and estimation of taxonomic diversity. We tested in three steps whether degraded DNA from dead material in soil has the potential of efficiently assessing biodiversity in different biomes. First, soil DNA from eight boreal plant communities located in two different vegetation types (meadow and heath) was amplified. Plant diversity detected from boreal soil was highly consistent with plant taxonomic and growth form diversity estimated from conventional above‐ground surveys. Second, we assessed DNA persistence using samples from formerly cultivated soils in temperate environments. We found that the number of crop DNA sequences retrieved strongly varied with years since last cultivation, and crop sequences were absent from nearby, uncultivated plots. Third, we assessed the universal applicability of DNA metabarcoding using soil samples from tropical environments: a large proportion of species and families from the study site were efficiently recovered. The results open unprecedented opportunities for large‐scale DNA‐based biodiversity studies across a range of taxonomic groups using standardized metabarcoding approaches.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-294x.2012.05545.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 296

Metadata

Authors
YOCCOZ, N. G., BRÅTHEN, K. A., GIELLY, L., HAILE, J., EDWARDS, M. E., GOSLAR, T., Von STEDINGK, H., BRYSTING, A. K., COISSAC, E., POMPANON, F., SØNSTEBØ, J. H., MIQUEL, C., VALENTINI, A., De BELLO, F., CHAVE, J., THUILLER, W., WINCKER, P., CRUAUD, C., GAVORY, F., RASMUSSEN, M., GILBERT, M. T. P., ORLANDO, L., BROCHMANN, C., WILLERSLEV, E., & TABERLET, P.
Venue
Molecular Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-04-16
Volume
21
Issue
15
Pages
3647-3655
ISSN
  • 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-294X
OpenAlex
W2166717918
Cited by
296
References
2
FWCI
16.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DNA from soil mirrors plant taxonomic and growth form diversity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2012.05545.x
The paper
YOCCOZ, N. G., BRÅTHEN, K. A., GIELLY, L., HAILE, J., EDWARDS, M. E., GOSLAR, T., Von STEDINGK, H., BRYSTING, A. K., COISSAC, E., POMPANON, F., SØNSTEBØ, J. H., MIQUEL, C., VALENTINI, A., De BELLO, F., CHAVE, J., THUILLER, W., WINCKER, P., CRUAUD, C., GAVORY, F., . . . TABERLET, P. (2012). DNA from soil mirrors plant taxonomic and growth form diversity. Molecular Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2012.05545.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.