Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 237

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Microbiome analysis among bats describes influences of host phylogeny, life history, physiology and geography

PHILLIPS, CALEB D., PHELAN, GEORGINA, DOWD, SCOT E., McDONOUGH, MOLLY M., FERGUSON, ADAM W., DELTON HANSON, J., SILES, LIZETTE, ORDÓÑEZ‐GARZA, NICTÉ, SAN FRANCISCO, MICHAEL, BAKER, ROBERT J.·2012·Molecular Ecology

Abstract

Metagenomic methods provide an experimental approach to inform the relationships between hosts and their microbial inhabitants. Previous studies have provided the conceptual realization that microbiomes are dynamic among hosts and the intimacy of relation between micro‐ and macroorganisms. Here, we present an intestinal microflora community analysis for members of the order Chiroptera and investigate the relative influence of variables in shaping observed microbiome relationships. The variables ranged from those considered to have ancient and long‐term influences (host phylogeny and life history) to the relatively transient variable of host reproductive condition. In addition, collection locality data, representing the geographic variable, were included in analyses. Results indicate a complex influence of variables in shaping sample relationships in which signal for host phylogeny is recovered at broad taxonomic levels (family), whereas intrafamilial analyses disclosed various degrees of resolution for the remaining variables. Although cumulative probabilities of assignment indicated both reproductive condition and geography influenced relationships, comparison of ecological measures among groups revealed statistical differences between most variable classifications. For example, ranked ecological diversity was associated with host phylogeny (deeper coalescences among families were associated with more microfloral diversity), dietary strategy (herbivory generally retained higher diversity than carnivory) and reproductive condition (reproductively active females displayed more diverse microflora than nonreproductive conditions). Overall, the results of this study describe a complex process shaping microflora communities of wildlife species as well as provide avenues for future research that will further inform the nature of symbiosis between microflora communities and hosts.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-294x.2012.05568.x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 237

Metadata

Authors
PHILLIPS, C. D., PHELAN, G., DOWD, S. E., McDONOUGH, M. M., FERGUSON, A. W., DELTON HANSON, J., SILES, L., ORDÓÑEZ‐GARZA, N., SAN FRANCISCO, M., & BAKER, R. J.
Venue
Molecular Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-04-23
Volume
21
Issue
11
Pages
2617-2627
ISSN
  • 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-294X
OpenAlex
W1524694663
Cited by
237
References
4
FWCI
3.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microbiome analysis among bats describes influences of host phylogeny, life history, physiology and geography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2012.05568.x
The paper
PHILLIPS, C. D., PHELAN, G., DOWD, S. E., McDONOUGH, M. M., FERGUSON, A. W., DELTON HANSON, J., SILES, L., ORDÓÑEZ‐GARZA, N., SAN FRANCISCO, M., & BAKER, R. J. (2012). Microbiome analysis among bats describes influences of host phylogeny, life history, physiology and geography. Molecular Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2012.05568.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.