The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measuring ectomycorrhizal fungal dispersal: macroecological patterns driven by microscopic propagules
Abstract
Dispersal plays a prominent role in most conceptual models of community assembly. However, direct measurement of dispersal across a whole community is difficult at ecologically relevant spatial scales. For cryptic organisms, such as fungi and bacteria, the scale and importance of dispersal limitation has become a major point of debate. We use an experimental island biogeographic approach to measure the effects of dispersal limitation on the ecological dynamics of an important group of plant symbionts, ectomycorrhizal fungi. We manipulated the isolation of uncolonized host seedlings across a natural landscape and used a range of molecular techniques to measure the dispersal rates of ectomycorrhizal propagules and host colonization. Some species were prolific dispersers, producing annual spore loads on the order of trillions of spores per km 2. However, fungal propagules reaching host seedlings decreased rapidly with increasing distance from potential spore sources, causing a concomitant reduction in ectomycorrhizal species richness, host colonization and host biomass. There were also strong differences in dispersal ability across species, which correlated well with the predictable composition of ectomycorrhizal communities associated with establishing pine forest. The use of molecular tools to measure whole community dispersal provides a direct confirmation for a key mechanism underlying island biogeography theory and has the potential to make microbial systems a model for understanding the role of dispersal in ecological theory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data
Caporaso, J. G., Kuczynski, J., Stombaugh, J., Bittinger, K., Bushman, F. D., Costello, E. K., Fierer, N., Peña, A. G., Goodrich, J. K., Gordon, J. I., et al. (2010) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.f.303 · Cited by 34,887
Ecological responses to recent climate change.
Walther, G.-R., Post, E., Convey, P., Menzel, A., Parmesan, C., Beebee, T. J. C., Fromentin, J.-M., Hoegh-Guldberg, O., & Bairlein, F. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/416389a · Cited by 9,975
The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities
Fierer, N., & Jackson, R. B. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0507535103 · Cited by 5,711
The Microbial Engines That Drive Earth's Biogeochemical Cycles
Falkowski, P. G., Fenchel, T., & Delong, E. F. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1153213 · Cited by 3,379
Biogeographic Kinetics: Estimation of Relaxation Times for Avifaunas of Southwest Pacific Islands
Diamond, J. M. (1972) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.69.11.3199 · Cited by 643
Cited by
Adams, R. I., Miletto, M., Taylor, J. W., & Bruns, T. D. (2013) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2013.28 · Cited by 939
Self-citationForest microbiome: diversity, complexity and dynamics
Baldrian, P. (2016) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1093/femsre/fuw040 · Cited by 710
Hewitt, R. E., Hollingsworth, T. N., Stuart Chapin III, F., & Lee Taylor, D. (2016) · BMC Ecology · doi:10.1186/s12898-016-0075-y · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- PEAY, K. G., SCHUBERT, M. G., NGUYEN, N. H., & BRUNS, T. D.
- Venue
- Molecular Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-06-15
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 4122-4136
- ISSN
- 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-294X
- OpenAlex
- W2120693010
- Cited by
- 410
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 22.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measuring ectomycorrhizal fungal dispersal: macroecological patterns driven by microscopic propagules. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2012.05666.x
- The paper
- PEAY, K. G., SCHUBERT, M. G., NGUYEN, N. H., & BRUNS, T. D. (2012). Measuring ectomycorrhizal fungal dispersal: macroecological patterns driven by microscopic propagules. Molecular Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2012.05666.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.