Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 175

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Genome‐wide patterns of divergence and gene flow across a butterfly radiation

Open access
Nadeau, Nicola J., Martin, Simon H., Kozak, Krzysztof M., Salazar, Camilo, Dasmahapatra, Kanchon K., Davey, John W., Baxter, Simon W., Blaxter, Mark L., Mallet, James, Jiggins, Chris D.·2013·Molecular Ecology

Abstract

The H eliconius butterflies are a diverse recent radiation comprising multiple levels of divergence with ongoing gene flow between species. The recently sequenced genome of H eliconius melpomene allowed us to investigate the genomic evolution of this group using dense RAD marker sequencing. Phylogenetic analysis of 54 individuals robustly supported reciprocal monophyly of H. melpomene and H eliconius cydno and refuted previous phylogenetic hypotheses that H. melpomene may be paraphylectic with respect to H. cydno. H eliconius timareta also formed a monophyletic clade closely related but distinct from H. cydno with H eliconius heurippa falling within this clade. We find evidence for genetic admixture between sympatric populations of the sister clades H. melpomene and H. cydno/timareta, particularly between H. cydno and H. melpomene from Central America and between H. timareta and H. melpomene from the eastern slopes of the A ndes. Between races, divergence is primarily explained by isolation by distance and there is no detectable genetic population structure between parapatric races, suggesting that hybrid zones between races are not zones of secondary contact. Our results also support previous findings that colour pattern loci are shared between populations and species with similar colour pattern elements. Furthermore, this pattern is almost unique to these genomic regions, with only a very small number of other loci showing significant similarity between populations and species with similar colour patterns.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-294x.2012.05730.x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Metadata

Authors
Nadeau, N. J., Martin, S. H., Kozak, K. M., Salazar, C., Dasmahapatra, K. K., Davey, J. W., Baxter, S. W., Blaxter, M. L., Mallet, J., & Jiggins, C. D.
Venue
Molecular Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-08-25
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
814-826
ISSN
  • 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-294X
OpenAlex
W2150250527
Cited by
175
References
4
FWCI
10.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genome‐wide patterns of divergence and gene flow across a butterfly radiation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2012.05730.x
The paper
Nadeau, N. J., Martin, S. H., Kozak, K. M., Salazar, C., Dasmahapatra, K. K., Davey, J. W., Baxter, S. W., Blaxter, M. L., Mallet, J., & Jiggins, C. D. (2013). Genome‐wide patterns of divergence and gene flow across a butterfly radiation. Molecular Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2012.05730.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.