The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genome‐wide patterns of latitudinal differentiation among populations of Drosophila melanogaster from North America
Open accessAbstract
Understanding the genetic underpinnings of adaptive change is a fundamental but largely unresolved problem in evolutionary biology. D rosophila melanogaster, an ancestrally tropical insect that has spread to temperate regions and become cosmopolitan, offers a powerful opportunity for identifying the molecular polymorphisms underlying clinal adaptation. Here, we use genome‐wide next‐generation sequencing of DNA pools (‘pool‐seq’) from three populations collected along the N orth A merican east coast to examine patterns of latitudinal differentiation. Comparing the genomes of these populations is particularly interesting since they exhibit clinal variation in a number of important life history traits. We find extensive latitudinal differentiation, with many of the most strongly differentiated genes involved in major functional pathways such as the insulin/TOR, ecdysone, torso, EGFR, TGF β/BMP, JAK/STAT, immunity and circadian rhythm pathways. We observe particularly strong differentiation on chromosome 3R, especially within the cosmopolitan inversion In(3R)Payne, which contains a large number of clinally varying genes. While much of the differentiation might be driven by clinal differences in the frequency of In(3R)P, we also identify genes that are likely independent of this inversion. Our results provide genome‐wide evidence consistent with pervasive spatially variable selection acting on numerous loci and pathways along the well‐known North American cline, with many candidates implicated in life history regulation and exhibiting parallel differentiation along the previously investigated Australian cline.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists
Quinn, G. P., & Keough, M. J. (2002) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511806384 · Cited by 10,674 · cited 1×
“We did not fit the interaction term since ANOVA applied to ranktransformed data is inappropriate for interpreting interactions (Quinn & Keough 2002).”
MethodMayr, E. (1963) · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674865327 · Cited by 10,175
Statistical significance for genomewide studies
Storey, J. D., & Tibshirani, R. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1530509100 · Cited by 9,692
The immune response of Drosophila
Hoffmann, J. A. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02021 · Cited by 1,553
Kofler, R., Pandey, R. V., & Schlötterer, C. (2011) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr589 · Cited by 815
Self-citationStinchcombe, J. R., & Hoekstra, H. E. (2008) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6800937 · Cited by 622
Tracking footprints of artificial selection in the dog genome
Akey, J. M., Ruhe, A. L., Akey, D. T., Wong, A. K., Connelly, C. F., Madeoy, J., Nicholas, T. J., & Neff, M. W. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0909918107 · Cited by 350
Natural Selection Favors a Newly Derived timeless Allele in Drosophila melanogaster
Tauber, E., Zordan, M., Sandrelli, F., Pegoraro, M., Osterwalder, N., Breda, C., Daga, A., Selmin, A., Monger, K., Benna, C., et al. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1138412 · Cited by 308 · cited 2×
“…as well, including timeless (tim), timeout and cryptochrome (cry), which have all previously been found to vary clinally (Sandrelli et al. 2007; Tauber et al. 2007; Turner et al. 2008; Kolaczkowski et al. 2011), as well as a novel clinal candidate, clock (Clk) (Appendix S10, Supporting…”
BackgroundTurner, T. L., Stewart, A. D., Fields, A. T., Rice, W. R., & Tarone, A. M. (2011) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1001336 · Cited by 297
BARTON, N. H. (1999) · Genetical Research · doi:10.1017/s001667239900422x · Cited by 181
Cited by
Evolutionary genomics can improve prediction of species’ responses to climate change
Waldvogel, A.-M., Feldmeyer, B., Rolshausen, G., Exposito-Alonso, M., Rellstab, C., Kofler, R., Mock, T., Schmid, K., Schmitt, I., Bataillon, T., et al. (2020) · Evolution Letters · doi:10.1002/evl3.154 · Cited by 348
Self-citationGagnaire, P., Broquet, T., Aurelle, D., Viard, F., Souissi, A., Bonhomme, F., Arnaud‐Haond, S., & Bierne, N. (2015) · Evolutionary Applications · doi:10.1111/eva.12288 · Cited by 270
Peng, J., Svetec, N., & Zhao, L. (2022) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msab350 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Fabian, D. K., Kapun, M., Nolte, V., Kofler, R., Schmidt, P. S., Schlötterer, C., & Flatt, T.
- Venue
- Molecular Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-08-22
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 4748-4769
- ISSN
- 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-294X
- OpenAlex
- W2097181563
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 11.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genome‐wide patterns of latitudinal differentiation among populations of Drosophila melanogaster from North America. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2012.05731.x
- The paper
- Fabian, D. K., Kapun, M., Nolte, V., Kofler, R., Schmidt, P. S., Schlötterer, C., & Flatt, T. (2012). Genome‐wide patterns of latitudinal differentiation among populations of Drosophila melanogaster from North America. Molecular Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2012.05731.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.