Cited by 350Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestockHuman-Animal Interaction StudiesGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals

Tracking footprints of artificial selection in the dog genome

Open access
Akey, Joshua M., Ruhe, Alison L., Akey, Dayna T., Wong, Aaron K., Connelly, Caitlin F., Madeoy, Jennifer, Nicholas, Thomas J., Neff, Mark W.·2010·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The size, shape, and behavior of the modern domesticated dog has been sculpted by artificial selection for at least 14,000 years. The genetic substrates of selective breeding, however, remain largely unknown. Here, we describe a genome-wide scan for selection in 275 dogs from 10 phenotypically diverse breeds that were genotyped for over 21,000 autosomal SNPs. We identified 155 genomic regions that possess strong signatures of recent selection and contain candidate genes for phenotypes that vary most conspicuously among breeds, including size, coat color and texture, behavior, skeletal morphology, and physiology. In addition, we demonstrate a significant association between HAS2 and skin wrinkling in the Shar-Pei, and provide evidence that regulatory evolution has played a prominent role in the phenotypic diversification of modern dog breeds. Our results provide a first-generation map of selection in the dog, illustrate how such maps can rapidly inform the genetic basis of canine phenotypic variation, and provide a framework for delineating the mechanistic basis of how artificial selection promotes rapid and pronounced phenotypic evolution.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0909918107

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Selective breeding has influenced the genes associated with behaviour.

    “Selective breeding has also influenced the genes associated with behaviour [140], and the degree of selection has also impacted behaviour [141].”

    From Ethical Concerns about Fashionable Dog Breeding (2024) · cites this paper as [140]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Akey, J. M., Ruhe, A. L., Akey, D. T., Wong, A. K., Connelly, C. F., Madeoy, J., Nicholas, T. J., & Neff, M. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • Translational Genomics Research Institute (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2010-01-11
Volume
107
Issue
3
Pages
1160-1165
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2134440374
Cited by
350
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 20
FWCI
13.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM076036)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
Keywords
selective breeding, dogs, dog breeds, candidate genes, HAS2, skin wrinkling, Shar-Pei, regulatory evolution, phenotypic diversification, body size, coat color, skeletal morphology
MeSH terms
Animals, Dogs, Phenotype, Selection, Genetic, Species Specificity, Genome, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review