The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Surprisingly diverged populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in natural environments remote from human activity
Abstract
The budding yeast, S accharomyces cerevisiae, is a leading system in genetics, genomics and molecular biology and is becoming a powerful tool to illuminate ecological and evolutionary principles. However, little is known of the ecology and population structure of this species in nature. Here, we present a field survey of this yeast at an unprecedented scale and have performed population genetics analysis of Chinese wild isolates with different ecological and geographical origins. We also included a set of worldwide isolates that represent the maximum genetic variation of S. cerevisiae documented so far. We clearly show that S. cerevisiae is a ubiquitous species in nature, occurring in highly diversified substrates from human‐associated environments as well as habitats remote from human activity. C hinese isolates of S. cerevisiae exhibited strong population structure with nearly double the combined genetic variation of isolates from the rest of the world. We identified eight new distinct wild lineages (CHN I–VIII) from a set of 99 characterized C hinese isolates. Isolates from primeval forests occur in ancient and significantly diverged basal lineages, while those from human‐associated environments generally cluster in less differentiated domestic or mosaic groups. Basal lineages from primeval forests are usually inbred, exhibit lineage‐specific karyotypes and are partially reproductively isolated. Our results suggest that greatly diverged populations of wild S. cerevisiae exist independently of and predate domesticated isolates. We find that China harbours a reservoir of natural genetic variation of S. cerevisiae and perhaps gives an indication of the origin of the species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees.
(1987) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454 · Cited by 59,715
CONFIDENCE LIMITS ON PHYLOGENIES: AN APPROACH USING THE BOOTSTRAP
Felsenstein, J. (1985) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00420.x · Cited by 44,647
Tamura, K., Peterson, D., Peterson, N., Stecher, G., Nei, M., & Kumar, S. (2011) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msr121 · Cited by 39,969
Thompson, J. (1997) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/25.24.4876 · Cited by 38,993
Inference of Population Structure Using Multilocus Genotype Data
Pritchard, J. K., Stephens, M., & Donnelly, P. (2000) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/155.2.945 · Cited by 33,908
Kimura, M. (1980) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf01731581 · Cited by 29,778
Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software structure: a simulation study
EVANNO, G., REGNAUT, S., & GOUDET, J. (2005) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2005.02553.x · Cited by 21,895
DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data
Librado, P., & Rozas, J. (2009) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp187 · Cited by 16,017
Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism.
Tajima, F. (1989) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/123.3.585 · Cited by 13,941
Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies
Price, A. L., Patterson, N. J., Plenge, R. M., Weinblatt, M. E., Shadick, N. A., & Reich, D. (2006) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1847 · Cited by 10,248
Cited by
Genome evolution across 1,011 Saccharomyces cerevisiae isolates
Peter, J., De Chiara, M., Friedrich, A., Yue, J.-X., Pflieger, D., Bergström, A., Sigwalt, A., Barre, B., Freel, K., Llored, A., et al. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0030-5 · Cited by 1,117
Self-citationDomestication and Divergence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Beer Yeasts
Gallone, B., Steensels, J., Prahl, T., Soriaga, L., Saels, V., Herrera-Malaver, B., Merlevede, A., Roncoroni, M., Voordeckers, K., Miraglia, L., et al. (2016) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.020 · Cited by 679
Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its industrial applications
Parapouli, M., 1 Molecular Biology laboratory, D. O. B. A. A. T., Vasileiadi, A., Afendra, A.-S., Hatziloukas, E., 2 Genetics laboratory, D. O. B. A. A. T., & equally, #. T. T. A. C. (2020) · AIMS Microbiology · doi:10.3934/microbiol.2020001 · Cited by 685
The origin and adaptive evolution of domesticated populations of yeast from Far East Asia
Duan, S.-F., Han, P.-J., Wang, Q.-M., Liu, W.-Q., Shi, J.-Y., Li, K., Zhang, X.-L., & Bai, F.-Y. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05106-7 · Cited by 244
Self-citationThe Genetics of Non-conventional Wine Yeasts: Current Knowledge and Future Challenges
Masneuf-Pomarede, I., Bely, M., Marullo, P., & Albertin, W. (2016) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2015.01563 · Cited by 111
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, Q., Liu, W., Liti, G., Wang, S., & Bai, F.
- Venue
- Molecular Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-08-22
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 5404-5417
- ISSN
- 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-294X
- OpenAlex
- W1975587955
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 67
- FWCI
- 10.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Surprisingly diverged populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in natural environments remote from human activity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2012.05732.x
- The paper
- Wang, Q., Liu, W., Liti, G., Wang, S., & Bai, F. (2012). Surprisingly diverged populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in natural environments remote from human activity. Molecular Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2012.05732.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.