Cited by 111Fermentation and Sensory AnalysisYeasts and Rust Fungi StudiesFungal and yeast genetics research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Genetics of Non-conventional Wine Yeasts: Current Knowledge and Future Challenges

Open access
Masneuf-Pomarede, Isabelle, Bely, Marina, Marullo, Philippe, Albertin, Warren·2016·Frontiers in Microbiology

Abstract

Saccharomyces cerevisiae is by far the most widely used yeast in oenology. However, during the last decade, several other yeasts species has been purposed for winemaking as they could positively impact wine quality. Some of these non-conventional yeasts (Torulaspora delbrueckii, Metschnikowia pulcherrima, Pichia kluyveri, Lachancea thermotolerans, etc.) are now proposed as starters culture for winemakers in mixed fermentation with S. cerevisiae, and several others are the subject of various studies (Hanseniaspora uvarum, Starmerella bacillaris, etc.). Along with their biotechnological use, the knowledge of these non-conventional yeasts greatly increased these last 10 years. The aim of this review is to describe the last updates and the current state-of-art of the genetics of non-conventional yeasts (including S. uvarum, T. delbrueckii, S. bacillaris, etc.). We describe how genomics and genetics tools provide new data into the population structure and biodiversity of non-conventional yeasts in winemaking environments. Future challenges will lie on the development of selection programs and/or genetic improvement of these non-conventional species. We discuss how genetics, genomics and the advances in next-generation sequencing will help the wine industry to develop the biotechnological use of non-conventional yeasts to improve the quality and differentiation of wines.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01563

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 165

  1. Aa, 2006, Population structure and gene evolution in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, FEMS Yeast Res., 6, 702, 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2006.00059.x · DOI
  2. Albergaria, 2010, Saccharomyces cerevisiae CCMI 885 secretes peptides that inhibit the growth of some non-Saccharomyces wine-related strains, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 86, 965, 10.1007/s00253-009-2409-6 · DOI
  3. Albertin, 2014a, Winemaking and bioprocesses strongly shaped the genetic diversity of the ubiquitous yeast Torulaspora delbrueckii, PLoS ONE, 9, e94246, 10.1371/journal.pone.0094246 · DOI
  4. Albertin, 2009, Evidence for autotetraploidy associated with reproductive isolation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: towards a new domesticated species, J. Evol. Biol., 22, 2157, 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01828.x · DOI
  5. Albertin, 2015, Biodiversity of Wine Yeasts: New Insights from Population Genetics
  6. Albertin, 2014b, Oenological prefermentation practices strongly impact yeast population dynamics and alcoholic fermentation kinetics in Chardonnay grape must, Int. J. Food Microbiol., 178, 87, 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2014.03.009 · DOI
  7. Albertin, 2016, Hanseniaspora uvarum from winemaking environments show spatial and temporal genetic clustering, Front. Microbiol, 6, 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01569 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Albertin, 2014c, Development of microsatellite markers for the rapid and reliable genotyping of Brettanomyces bruxellensis at strain level, Food Microbiol., 42, 188, 10.1016/j.fm.2014.03.012 · DOI
  9. Almeida, 2015, A population genomics insight into the mediterranean origins of wine yeast domestication, Mol. Ecol, 24, 5412, 10.1111/mec.13341 · DOI
  10. Almeida, 2014, A Gondwanan imprint on global diversity and domestication of wine and cider yeast Saccharomyces uvarum, Nat. Commun., 5, 4044, 10.1038/ncomms5044 · DOI
  11. Al Safadi, 2010, A polyploid population of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with separate sexes (dioecy), FEMS Yeast Res., 10, 757, 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2010.00660.x · DOI
  12. Ambroset, 2011, Deciphering the molecular basis of wine yeast fermentation traits using a combined genetic and genomic approach, G3, 1, 263, 10.1534/g3.111.000422 · DOI
  13. Andorrà, 2012, Effect of mixed culture fermentations on yeast populations and aroma profile, LWT Food Sci. Technol., 49, 8, 10.1016/j.lwt.2012.04.008 · DOI
  14. Anfang, 2009, Co-fermentation with Pichia kluyveri increases varietal thiol concentrations in Sauvignon Blanc, Aust. J. Grape Wine Res., 15, 1, 10.1111/j.1755-0238.2008.00031.x · DOI
  15. Azzolini, 2012, Effects of Torulaspora delbrueckii and Saccharomyces cerevisiae mixed cultures on fermentation and aroma of Amarone wine, Eur. Food Res. Technol., 235, 303, 10.1007/s00217-012-1762-3 · DOI
  16. Ball, 1984, Genetics and Breeding of Industrial Microorganisms
  17. Barnett, 2000, Yeasts: Characteritics and Identification.
  18. Barquet, 2012, Tandem repeat-tRNA (TRtRNA) PCR method for the molecular typing of non-Saccharomyces subspecies, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 93, 807, 10.1007/s00253-011-3714-4 · DOI
  19. Barrio, 2006, Molecular mechanisms involved in the adaptive evolution of industrial yeasts, 153, 10.1007/978-3-540-28398-0_6 · DOI
  20. Bely, 2013, Non-conventional yeasts and alcohol level reduction, 33
  21. Bely, 2008, Impact of mixed Torulaspora delbrueckii-Saccharomyces cerevisiae culture on high-sugar fermentation, Int. J. Food Microbiol., 122, 312, 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.12.023 · DOI
  22. Blein-Nicolas, 2015, A systems approach to elucidate heterosis of protein abundances in yeast, Mol. Cell. Proteomics, 14, 2056, 10.1074/mcp.M115.048058 · DOI
  23. Borneman, 2012, The genome sequence of the wine yeast VIN7 reveals an allotriploid hybrid genome with Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces kudriavzevii origins, FEMS Yeast Res., 12, 88, 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2011.00773.x · DOI
  24. Borneman, 2008, Comparative genome analysis of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine strain, FEMS Yeast Res., 8, 1185, 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2008.00434.x · DOI
  25. Branco, 2015, Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) produced by Saccharomyces cerevisiae induce alterations in the intracellular pH, membrane permeability and culturability of Hanseniaspora guilliermondii cells, Int. J. Food Microbiol., 205, 112, 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.04.015 · DOI
  26. Breuer, 2006, Debaryomyces hansenii–an extremophilic yeast with biotechnological potential, Yeast, 23, 415, 10.1002/yea.1374 · DOI
  27. Chan, 2012, Genome sequence of Pichia kudriavzevii M12, a potential producer of bioethanol and phytase, Eukaryot. Cell, 11, 1300, 10.1128/EC.00229-12 · DOI
  28. Ciani, 2006, Fermentation behaviour and metabolic interactions of multistarter wine yeast fermentations, Int. J. Food Microbiol., 108, 239, 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2005.11.012 · DOI
  29. Ciani, 2014, Sequential fermentation using non-Saccharomyces yeasts for the reduction of alcohol content in wine, BIO Web Conf., 3, 02015, 10.1051/bioconf/20140302015 · DOI
  30. Ciani, 2015, Yeast interactions in multi-starter wine fermentation, Curr. Opin. Food Sci., 1, 1, 10.1016/j.cofs.2014.07.001 · DOI
  31. Ciani, 2010, Controlled mixed culture fermentation: a new perspective on the use of non-Saccharomyces yeasts in winemaking, FEMS Yeast Res., 10, 123, 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2009.00579.x · DOI
  32. Ciani, 1998, Oenological properties of non-Saccharomyces yeasts associated with wine-making, World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 14, 199, 10.1023/A:1008825928354 · DOI
  33. Clemente-Jimenez, 2004, Molecular characterization and oenological properties of wine yeasts isolated during spontaneous fermentation of six varieties of grape must, Food Microbiol., 21, 149, 10.1016/S0740-0020(03)00063-7 · DOI
  34. Cliften, 2003, Finding functional features in Saccharomyces genomes by phylogenetic footprinting, Science, 301, 71, 10.1126/science.1084337 · DOI
  35. Comitini, 2011, Selected non-Saccharomyces wine yeasts in controlled multistarter fermentations with Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Food Microbiol., 28, 873, 10.1016/j.fm.2010.12.001 · DOI
  36. Comitini, 2004, Pichia anomala and Kluyveromyces wickerhamii killer toxins as new tools against Dekkera/Brettanomyces spoilage yeasts, FEMS Microbiol. Lett., 238, 235, 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2004.tb09761.x · DOI
  37. Csoma, 2008, Taxonomic reclassification of Candida stellata strains reveals frequent occurrence of Candida zemplinina in wine fermentation, FEMS Yeast Res., 8, 328, 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2007.00339.x · DOI
  38. Cubillos, 2009, Self-fertilization is the main sexual reproduction mechanism in native wine yeast populations, FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 67, 162, 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2008.00600.x · DOI
  39. da Silva, 2015, Hybridization within Saccharomyces Genus Results in Homoeostasis and Phenotypic Novelty in Winemaking Conditions, PLoS ONE, 10, e0123834, 10.1371/journal.pone.0123834 · DOI
  40. Diezmann, 2009, Saccharomyces cerevisiae: population Divergence and Resistance to Oxidative Stress in Clinical, Domesticated and Wild Isolates, PLoS ONE, 4, e5317, 10.1371/journal.pone.0005317 · DOI
  41. Di Maio, 2012, Presence of Candida zemplinina in sicilian musts and selection of a strain for wine mixed fermentations, S. Afr. J. Enol. Viticult., 33, 80
  42. Divol, 2012, Surviving in the presence of sulphur dioxide: strategies developed by wine yeasts, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 95, 601, 10.1007/s00253-012-4186-x · DOI
  43. Domizio, 2014, Use of non-Saccharomyces wine yeasts as novel sources of mannoproteins in wine, Food Microbiol., 43, 5, 10.1016/j.fm.2014.04.005 · DOI
  44. Domizio, 2011a, Potential spoilage non-Saccharomyces yeasts in mixed cultures with Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Ann. Microbiol., 61, 137, 10.1007/s13213-010-0125-1 · DOI
  45. Domizio, 2011b, Outlining a future for non-Saccharomyces yeasts: Selection of putative spoilage wine strains to be used in association with Saccharomyces cerevisiae for grape juice fermentation, Int. J. Food Microbiol., 147, 170, 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.03.020 · DOI
  46. Egli, 1998, Dynamics of indigenous and inoculated yeast populations and their effect on the sensory character of Riesling and Chardonnay wines, J. Appl. Microbiol., 85, 779, 10.1046/j.1365-2672.1998.00521.x · DOI
  47. Ehrenreich, 2010, Dissection of genetically complex traits with extremely large pools of yeast segregants, Nature, 464, 1039, 10.1038/nature08923 · DOI
  48. Englezos, 2015, Exploitation of the non-Saccharomyces yeast Starmerella bacillaris (synonym Candida zemplinina) in wine fermentation: physiological and molecular characterizations, Int. J. Food Microbiol., 199, 33, 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.01.009 · DOI
  49. Erny, 2012, Ecological success of a group of Saccharomyces cerevisiae/Saccharomyces kudriavzevii hybrids in the Northern European wine making environment, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 8, 3256, 10.1128/AEM.06752-11 · DOI
  50. Esteve-Zarzoso, 2001, Molecular characterisation of Hanseniaspora species, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 80, 85, 10.1023/A:1012268931569 · DOI
  51. Fay, 2005, Evidence for domesticated and wild populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, PLoS Genet., 1, 66, 10.1371/journal.pgen.0010005 · DOI
  52. Foury, 1998, The complete sequence of the mitochondrial genome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, FEBS Lett., 440, 325, 10.1016/S0014-5793(98)01467-7 · DOI
  53. Freel, 2014, Population genomic analysis reveals highly conserved mitochondrial genomes in the yeast species Lachancea thermotolerans, Genome Biol. Evol., 6, 2586, 10.1093/gbe/evu203 · DOI
  54. Friel, 2005, Genetic characterization of the yeast Pichia anomala (strain K), an antagonist of postharvest diseases of apple, J. Appl. Microbiol., 98, 783, 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02520.x · DOI
  55. García-Ríos, 2014, The fitness advantage of commercial wine yeasts in relation to the nitrogen concentration, temperature, and ethanol content under microvinification conditions, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 80, 704, 10.1128/AEM.03405-13 · DOI
  56. Giaramida, 2013, Candida zemplinina for production of wines with less alcohol and more glycerol, S. Afr. J. Enol. Viticult., 34, 204, 10.1128/AEM.06768-11 · DOI
  57. Giorello, 2014, Genome sequence of the native apiculate wine yeast Hanseniaspora vineae T02/19AF, Genome Announc, 2, e00530, 10.1128/genomeA.00530-14 · DOI
  58. Giudici, 2005, Strategies and perspectives for genetic improvement of wine yeasts, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 66, 622, 10.1007/s00253-004-1784-2 · DOI
  59. Goddard, 2008, Quantifying the complexities of Saccharomyces cerevisiae's ecosystem engineering via fermentation, Ecology, 89, 2077, 10.1890/07-2060.1 · DOI
  60. Goddard, 2010, A distinct population of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in New Zealand: evidence for local dispersal by insects and human-aided global dispersal in oak barrels, Environ. Microbiol., 12, 63, 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.02035.x · DOI
  61. Goffeau, 1996, Life with 6000 genes, Science, 274, 546; 563, 10.1126/science.274.5287.546 · DOI
  62. Gomez-Angulo, 2015, Genome sequence of Torulaspora delbrueckii NRRL Y-50541, isolated from mezcal fermentation, Genome Announc., 3, e00438, 10.1128/genomeA.00438-15 · DOI
  63. Gordon, 2011, Evolutionary erosion of yeast sex chromosomes by mating-type switching accidents, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 108, 20024, 10.1073/pnas.1112808108 · DOI
  64. Grangeteau, 2015, Diversity of yeast strains of the genus Hanseniaspora in the winery environment: what is their involvement in grape must fermentation?, Food Microbiol., 50, 70, 10.1016/j.fm.2015.03.009 · DOI
  65. Hall, 2011, Population dynamics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae during spontaneous fermentation at a British Columbia Winery, Am. J. Enol. Vitic., 62, 66, 10.5344/ajev.2010.10054 · DOI
  66. Hong, 2013, Role of non-Saccharomyces yeasts in Korean wines produced from campbell early grapes: potential use of Hanseniaspora uvarum as a starter culture, Food Microbiol., 34, 207, 10.1016/j.fm.2012.12.011 · DOI
  67. Howell, 2006, Metabolic profiling as a tool for revealing Saccharomyces interactions during wine fermentation, FEMS Yeast Res., 6, 91, 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2005.00010.x · DOI
  68. Jara, 2014, Mapping genetic variants underlying differences in the central nitrogen metabolism in fermenter yeasts, PLoS ONE, 9, e86533, 10.1371/journal.pone.0086533 · DOI
  69. Jarosz, 2014, Cross-kingdom chemical communication drives a heritable, mutually beneficial prion-based transformation of metabolism, Cell, 158, 1083, 10.1016/j.cell.2014.07.025 · DOI
  70. Johnson, 2004, Population genetics of the wild yeast Saccharomyces paradoxus, Genetics, 166, 43, 10.1534/genetics.166.1.43 · DOI
  71. Jolly, 2006, The role and use of non-Saccharomyces yeasts in wine production, S. Afr. J. Enol. Viticult., 27, 15
  72. Jung, 2012, Mitochondrial genome evolution in a single protoploid yeast species, G3, 2, 1103, 10.1534/g3.112.003152 · DOI · Paper page
  73. Kemsawasd, 2015, Cell-to-cell contact and antimicrobial peptides play a combined role in the death of Lachanchea thermotolerans during mixed-culture alcoholic fermentation with Saccharomyces cerevisiae, FEMS Microbiol. Lett., 362, 10.1093/femsle/fnv103 · DOI
  74. Kimura, 1980, A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences, J. Mol. Evol., 16, 111, 10.1007/BF01731581 · DOI · Paper page
  75. King, 2008, Coinoculated fermentations using Saccharomyces yeasts affect the volatile composition and sensory properties of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Sauvignon Blanc Wines, J. Agric. Food Chem., 56, 10829, 10.1021/jf801695h · DOI
  76. Knop, 2006, Evolution of the hemiascomycete yeasts: on life styles and the importance of inbreeding, Bioessays, 28, 696, 10.1002/bies.20435 · DOI
  77. Kreger-van Rij, 1977, Ultrastructure of Hanseniaspora ascospores, Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek, 43, 225, 10.1007/BF00395677 · DOI
  78. Kumar, 2012, Draft genome sequence of salt-tolerant yeast Debaryomyces hansenii var. hansenii MTCC 234, Eukaryotic Cell, 11, 961, 10.1128/EC.00137-12 · DOI
  79. Kurtzman, 2011, The Yeasts: A Taxonomic Study.
  80. Kvitek, 2008, Variations in Stress Sensitivity and Genomic Expression in Diverse, S. cerevisiae Isolates, PLoS Genet., 4, e1000223, 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000223 · DOI
  81. Landry, 2006, Genome-wide scan reveals that genetic variation for transcriptional plasticity in yeast is biased towards multi-copy and dispensable genes, Gene, 366, 343, 10.1016/j.gene.2005.10.042 · DOI
  82. Legras, 2007, Bread, beer and wine: Saccharomyces cerevisiae diversity reflects human history, Mol. Ecol., 16, 2091, 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03266.x · DOI
  83. Legras, 2005, Selection of hypervariable microsatellite loci for the characterization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains, Int. J. Food Microbiol., 102, 73, 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.12.007 · DOI
  84. Liti, 2009, Population genomics of domestic and wild yeasts, Nature, 458, 337, 10.1038/nature07743 · DOI
  85. Liti, 2005, Yeast evolution and comparative genomics, Annu. Rev. Microbiol., 59, 135, 10.1146/annurev.micro.59.030804.121400 · DOI
  86. Liti, 2005, Inferences of evolutionary relationships from a population survey of LTR-retrotransposons and telomeric-associated sequences in the Saccharomyces sensu stricto complex, Yeast, 22, 177, 10.1002/yea.1200 · DOI
  87. Magyar, 2014, Anaerobic organic acid metabolism of Candida zemplinina in comparison with Saccharomyces wine yeasts, Int. J. Food Microbiol., 178, 1, 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2014.03.002 · DOI
  88. Magyar, 2011, Comparative evaluation of some oenological properties in wine strains of Candida stellata, Candida zemplinina, Saccharomyces uvarum and Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Food Microbiol., 28, 94, 10.1016/j.fm.2010.08.011 · DOI
  89. Malpertuy, 2000, Genomic exploration of the hemiascomycetous yeasts: 10, Kluyveromyces thermotolerans. FEBS Lett., 487, 61, 10.1016/S0014-5793(00)02281-X · DOI
  90. Mangani, 2011, Effects of microbial populations on anthocyanin profile of sangiovese wines produced in Tuscany, Italy, Am. J. Enol. Vitic., 62, 487, 10.5344/ajev.2011.11047 · DOI
  91. Marsit, 2015, Evolutionary advantage conferred by an eukaryote-to-eukaryote gene transfer event in wine yeasts, Mol. Biol. Evol., 32, 1695, 10.1093/molbev/msv057 · DOI
  92. Marullo, 2007, Single QTL mapping and nucleotide-level resolution of a physiologic trait in wine Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains, FEMS Yeast Res., 7, 941, 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2007.00252.x · DOI
  93. Marullo, 2006, Breeding strategies for combining fermentative qualities and reducing off-flavor production in a wine yeast model, FEMS Yeast Res., 6, 268, 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2006.00034.x · DOI
  94. Marullo, 2010, Yeast selection for wine flavour modulation, 293, 10.1533/9781845699987.2.293 · DOI
  95. Masneuf-Pomarede, 2010, Reassessment of phenotypic traits for Saccharomyces bayanus var. uvarum wine yeast strains, Int. J. Food Microbiol., 139, 79, 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.01.038 · DOI
  96. Masneuf-Pomarede, 2015, The yeast Starmerella bacillaris (synonym Candida zemplinina) shows high genetic diversity in winemaking environments. 15:fov045, FEMS Yeast Res., 10.1093/femsyr/fov045 · DOI
  97. Masneuf-Pomarede, 2007, Molecular typing of wine yeast strains Saccharomyces bayanus var. uvarum using microsatellite markers, Syst. Appl. Microbiol., 30, 75, 10.1016/j.syapm.2006.02.006 · DOI
  98. Masneuf-Pomarede, 2009, First insight into the genetic structure of S. bayanus var. uvarum revealed by microsatellite markers analysis
  99. Maturano, 2015, Yeast population dynamics during prefermentative cold soak of Cabernet Sauvignon and Malbec wines, Int. J. Food Microbiol., 199, 23, 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.01.005 · DOI
  100. Miller, 1989, The value of orthogonal-field-alternation gel electrophoresis and other criteria in the taxonomy of the Genus Pichia Hansen emend. Kurtzman, Syst. Appl. Microbiol., 12, 191, 10.1016/S0723-2020(89)80014-1 · DOI
  101. Mira, 2014, The genome sequence of the highly acetic acid-tolerant Zygosaccharomyces bailii-derived interspecies hybrid strain ISA1307, isolated from a sparkling wine plant, DNA Res, 21, 299, 10.1093/dnares/dst058 · DOI
  102. Moreira, 2008, Heavy sulphur compounds, higher alcohols and esters production profile of Hanseniaspora uvarum and Hanseniaspora guilliermondii grown as pure and mixed cultures in grape must, Int. J. Food Microbiol., 124, 231, 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.03.025 · DOI
  103. Muller, 2009, Microsatellite analysis of genetic diversity among clinical and nonclinical Saccharomyces cerevisiae isolates suggests heterozygote advantage in clinical environments, Mol. Ecol., 18, 2779, 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04234.x · DOI
  104. Murphy, 2010, Yeast sex: surprisingly high rates of outcrossing between asci, PLoS ONE, 5, e10461, 10.1371/journal.pone.0010461 · DOI
  105. Naumov, 2000, Association of Saccharomyces bayanus var. uvarum with some French wines: genetic analysis of yeast populations, Res. Microbiol., 151, 683, 10.1016/S0923-2508(00)90131-1 · DOI
  106. Naumov, 2009, Chromosomal differentiation of the sibling species Pichia membranifaciens and Pichia manshurica, Microbiology, 78, 214, 10.1134/S002626170902012X · DOI
  107. Nissen, 2003, Characterization of early deaths of non-Saccharomyces yeasts in mixed cultures with Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Arch. Microbiol., 180, 257, 10.1007/s00203-003-0585-9 · DOI
  108. Nissen, 2003, Viable Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells at high concentrations cause early growth arrest of non-Saccharomyces yeasts in mixed cultures by a cell–cell contact-mediated mechanism, Yeast, 20, 331, 10.1002/yea.965 · DOI
  109. Novo, 2009, Eukaryote-to-eukaryote gene transfer events revealed by the genome sequence of the wine yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae EC1118, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 106, 16333, 10.1073/pnas.0904673106 · DOI
  110. Pacheco, 2009, Improved gene disruption method for Torulaspora delbrueckii, FEMS Yeast Res., 9, 158, 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2008.00452.x · DOI
  111. Palanca, 2013, Quantifying variation in the ability of yeasts to attract Drosophila melanogaster, PLoS ONE, 8, e75332, 10.1371/journal.pone.0075332 · DOI
  112. Paradis, 2004, APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language, Bioinformatics, 20, 289, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg412 · DOI · Paper page
  113. Parapouli, 2010, The effect of Debina grapevine indigenous yeast strains of Metschnikowia and Saccharomyces on wine flavour, J. Indust. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 37, 85, 10.1007/s10295-009-0651-7 · DOI
  114. Parle, 1966, The source of yeasts in New Zealand wines, N.Z. J. Agric. Res., 9, 98, 10.1080/00288233.1966.10418122 · DOI
  115. Pérez-Nevado, 2006, Cellular death of two non-Saccharomyces wine-related yeasts during mixed fermentations with Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Int. J. Food Microbiol., 108, 336, 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2005.12.012 · DOI
  116. Pfliegler, 2014, Diversity of Candida zemplinina isolates inferred from RAPD, micro/minisatellite and physiological analysis, Microbiol. Res., 169, 402, 10.1016/j.micres.2013.09.006 · DOI
  117. Picazo, 2015, Mitochondria inheritance is a key factor for tolerance to dehydration in wine yeast production, Lett. Appl. Microbiol., 60, 217, 10.1111/lam.12369 · DOI
  118. Pina, 1986, Intergeneric hybrids of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Zygosaccharomyces fermentati obtained by protoplast fusion, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 51, 995, 10.1128/AEM.51.5.995-1003.1986 · DOI
  119. Plech, 2014, Heterosis is prevalent among domesticated but not wild strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, G3, 4, 315, 10.1534/g3.113.009381 · DOI
  120. Pramateftaki, 2006, The mitochondrial genome of the wine yeast Hanseniaspora uvarum: a unique genome organization among yeast/fungal counterparts, FEMS Yeast Res., 6, 77, 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2005.00018.x · DOI
  121. Pramateftaki, 2008, Complete mitochondrial genome sequence of the wine yeast Candida zemplinina: intraspecies distribution of a novel group-IIB1 intron with eubacterial affiliations, FEMS Yeast Res., 8, 311, 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2007.00332.x · DOI
  122. Pretorius, 2000, Tailoring wine yeast for the new millennium: novel approaches to the ancient art of winemaking, Yeast, 16, 675, 10.1002/1097-0061(20000615)16:8675::AID-YEA5853.0.CO;2-B · DOI
  123. Ramírez, 2015, A new wine Torulaspora delbrueckii killer strain with broad antifungal activity and its toxin-encoding double-stranded RNA virus, Front. Microbiol., 6, 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00983 · DOI
  124. Renault, 2013, An innovative tool reveals interaction mechanisms among yeast populations under oenological conditions, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 97, 4105, 10.1007/s00253-012-4660-5 · DOI
  125. Renault, 2009, Genetic characterization and phenotypic variability in Torulaspora delbrueckii species: potential applications in the wine industry, Int. J. Food Microbiol., 134, 201, 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.06.008 · DOI
  126. Richards, 2009, A database of microsatellite genotypes for Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek, 96, 355, 10.1007/s10482-009-9346-3 · DOI
  127. Roberts, 2011, The yin and yang of yeast: biodiversity research and systems biology as complementary forces driving innovation in biotechnology, Biotechnol. Lett., 33, 477, 10.1007/s10529-010-0482-7 · DOI
  128. Rodrigues, 2003, The spoilage yeast Zygosaccharomyces bailii forms mitotic spores: a screening method for haploidization, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 69, 649, 10.1128/AEM.69.1.649-653.2003 · DOI
  129. Rojas, 2001, Studies on acetate ester production by non-Saccharomyces wine yeasts, Int. J. Food Microbiol., 70, 283, 10.1016/S0168-1605(01)00552-9 · DOI
  130. Ruderfer, 2006, Population genomic analysis of outcrossing and recombination in yeast, Nat. Genet., 38, 1077, 10.1038/ng1859 · DOI
  131. Sadoudi, 2012, Yeast-yeast interactions revealed by aromatic profile analysis of Sauvignon Blanc wine fermented by single or co-culture of non-Saccharomyces and Saccharomyces yeasts, Food Microbiol., 32, 243, 10.1016/j.fm.2012.06.006 · DOI
  132. Salinas, 2012, The genetic basis of natural variation in oenological traits in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, PLoS ONE, 7, e49640, 10.1371/journal.pone.0049640 · DOI
  133. Salvadó, 2011, Quantifying the individual effects of ethanol and temperature on the fitness advantage of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Food Microbiol., 28, 1155, 10.1016/j.fm.2011.03.008 · DOI
  134. Sarilar, 2015, Evolutionary dynamics of hAT DNA transposon families in Saccharomycetaceae, Genome Biol. Evol., 7, 172, 10.1093/gbe/evu273 · DOI
  135. Scannell, 2007, Yeast genome evolution–the origin of the species, Yeast, 24, 929, 10.1002/yea.1515 · DOI
  136. Schacherer, 2009, Comprehensive polymorphism survey elucidates population structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Nature, 458, 342, 10.1038/nature07670 · DOI
  137. Schuller, 2012, Genetic diversity and population structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains isolated from different grape varieties and winemaking regions, PLoS ONE, 7, e32507, 10.1371/journal.pone.0032507 · DOI
  138. Sicard, 2011, Bread, beer and wine: yeast domestication in the Saccharomyces sensu stricto complex, C. R. Biol., 334, 229, 10.1016/j.crvi.2010.12.016 · DOI
  139. Sipiczki, 2004, Species identification and comparative molecular and physiological analysis of Candida zemplinina and Candida stellata, J. Basic Microbiol., 44, 471, 10.1002/jobm.200410449 · DOI
  140. Sniegowski, 2002, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces paradoxus coexist in a natural woodland site in North America and display different levels of reproductive isolation from European conspecifics, FEMS Yeast Res., 1, 299, 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2002.tb00048.x · DOI
  141. Solieri, 2013, Next-generation sequencing and its potential impact on food microbial genomics, Ann. Microbiol., 63, 21, 10.1007/s13213-012-0478-8 · DOI
  142. Souciet, 2009, Comparative genomics of protoploid Saccharomycetaceae, Genome Res., 19, 1696, 10.1101/gr.091546.109 · DOI
  143. Starmer, 1992, Geographic distribution and genetics of killer phenotypes for the yeast Pichia kluyveri across the United States, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 58, 990, 10.1128/AEM.58.3.990-997.1992 · DOI
  144. Steensels, 2014, Improving industrial yeast strains: exploiting natural and artificial diversity, FEMS Microbiol. Rev., 38, 947, 10.1111/1574-6976.12073 · DOI
  145. Steensels, 2014, Taming wild yeast: potential of conventional and nonconventional yeasts in industrial fermentations, Annu. Rev. Microbiol., 68, 61, 10.1146/annurev-micro-091213-113025 · DOI
  146. Stefanini, 2012, Role of social wasps in Saccharomyces cerevisiae ecology and evolution, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 109, 13398, 10.1073/pnas.1208362109 · DOI
  147. Strope, 2015, The 100-genomes strains, an S. cerevisiae resource that illuminates its natural phenotypic and genotypic variation and emergence as an opportunistic pathogen, Genome Res., 25, 762, 10.1101/gr.185538.114 · DOI
  148. Talla, 2005, The complete mitochondrial genome of the yeast Kluyveromyces thermotolerans, FEBS Lett., 579, 30, 10.1016/j.febslet.2004.10.106 · DOI
  149. Timberlake, 2011, A new yeast genetic resource for analysis and breeding, Yeast, 28, 63, 10.1002/yea.1821 · DOI
  150. Tofalo, 2014, Biodiversity study of wine yeasts belonging to the “terroir” of Montepulciano d'Abruzzo “Colline Teramane” revealed Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains exhibiting atypical and unique 5.8S-ITS restriction patterns, Food Microbiol., 39, 7, 10.1016/j.fm.2013.10.001 · DOI
  151. Tofalo, 2013, Biogeographical characterization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine yeast by molecular methods, Front. Microbiol., 4, 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00166 · DOI
  152. Tofalo, 2012, Diversity of Candida zemplinina strains from grapes and Italian wines, Food Microbiol., 29, 18, 10.1016/j.fm.2011.08.014 · DOI
  153. Viana, 2011, Monitoring a mixed starter of Hanseniaspora vineae–Saccharomyces cerevisiae in natural must: impact on 2-phenylethyl acetate production, Int. J. Food Microbiol., 151, 235, 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.09.005 · DOI
  154. Viana, 2008, Rational selection of non-Saccharomyces wine yeasts for mixed starters based on ester formation and enological traits, Food Microbiol., 25, 778, 10.1016/j.fm.2008.04.015 · DOI
  155. Wang, 2013, Dynamic study of yeast species and Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains during the spontaneous fermentations of Muscat blanc in Jingyang, China, Food Microbiol., 33, 172, 10.1016/j.fm.2012.09.014 · DOI
  156. Wang, 2015, Interaction between Hanseniaspora uvarum and Saccharomyces cerevisiae during alcoholic fermentation, Int. J. Food Microbiol., 206, 67, 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.04.022 · DOI
  157. Wang, 2012, Surprisingly diverged populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in natural environments remote from human activity, Mol. Ecol., 21, 5404, 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05732.x · DOI
  158. Warringer, 2011, Trait variation in yeast is defined by population history, PLoS Genet., 7, e1002111, 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002111 · DOI
  159. Wrent, 2015, Development of an affordable typing method for Meyerozyma guilliermondii using microsatellite markers, Int. J. Food Microbiol., 217, 1, 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.10.008 · DOI
  160. Wu, 2015, Extensive horizontal transfer and homologous recombination generate highly chimeric mitochondrial genomes in yeast, Mol. Biol. Evol., 32, 2559, 10.1093/molbev/msv127 · DOI
  161. Yanai, 1999, Isolation and properties of β-glucosidase produced by Debaryomyces hansenii and its application in winemaking, Am. J. Enol. Vitic., 50, 231, 10.5344/ajev.1999.50.3.231 · DOI
  162. Zara, 2014, Wine quality improvement through the combined utilisation of yeast hulls and Candida zemplinina/Saccharomyces cerevisiae mixed starter cultures, Aust. J. Grape Wine Res., 20, 199, 10.1111/ajgw.12078 · DOI
  163. Zeyl, 2004, Capturing the adaptive mutation in yeast, Res. Microbiol., 155, 217, 10.1016/j.resmic.2003.12.006 · DOI
  164. Zimmer, 2014, QTL dissection of lag phase in wine fermentation reveals a new translocation responsible for Saccharomyces cerevisiae adaptation to sulfite, PLoS ONE, 9, e86298, 10.1371/journal.pone.0086298 · DOI
  165. Zott, 2011, The grape must non-Saccharomyces microbial community: impact on volatile thiol release, Int. J. Food Microbiol., 151, 210, 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.08.026 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 111

Metadata

Authors
Masneuf-Pomarede, I., Bely, M., Marullo, P., & Albertin, W.
Affiliations
Université de Bordeaux (FR)
Corresponding author
Albertin, Warren
Venue
Frontiers in Microbiology
Published
2016-01-11
Volume
6
Pages
1563-1563
ISSN
1664-302X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2262698993
Cited by
111
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 8
FWCI
1.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Microbiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Oskar-Bordeaux (Universite de Bordeaux) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013 n° 315065)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Fermentation and Sensory Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
Keywords
Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Torulaspora delbrueckii, Metschnikowia pulcherrima, Pichia kluyveri, Lachancea thermotolerans, Hanseniaspora uvarum, Starmerella bacillaris, mixed culture fermentation, yeast diversity, yeast genomics, yeast genetics, yeast strain selection, wine quality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review