The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The influence of ribosome‐binding‐site elements on translational efficiency in Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli in vivo
Abstract
Summary: A method is described to determine simultaneously the effect of any changes in the ribosome‐binding site (RBS) of mRNA on translational efficiency in Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli in vivo. The approach was used to analyse systematically the influence of spacing between the Shine‐Dalgarno sequence and the initiation codon, the three different initiation codons, and RBS secondary structure on translational yields in the two organisms. Both B. subtilis and E. coli exhibited similar spacing optima of 7–9 nucleotides. However, B. subtilis translated messages with spacings shorter than optimal much less efficiently than E. coli. In both organisms, AUG was the preferred initiation codon by two‐ to threefold. In E coli GUG was slightly better than (JUG while in B. subtilis UUG was better than GUG. The degree of emphasis placed on initiation codon type, as measured by translational yield, was dependent on the strength of the Shine‐Dalgarno interaction in both organisms. B. subtilis v/as also much less able to tolerate secondary structure in the RBS than E. coli. While significant differences were found between the two organisms in the effect of specific RBS elements on translation, other mRNA components in addition to those elements tested appear to be responsible, in part, for translational species specificity. The approach described provides a rapid and systematic means of elucidating such additional determinants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A rapid alkaline extraction procedure for screening recombinant plasmid DNA
Birnboim, H. C., & Doly, J. (1979) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/7.6.1513 · Cited by 14,686
Quantitative analysis of the relationship between nucleotide sequence and functional activity
Stormo, G. D., Schneider, T. D., & Gold, L. (1986) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/14.16.6661 · Cited by 158
Cited by
Automated design of synthetic ribosome binding sites to control protein expression
Salis, H. M., Mirsky, E. A., & Voigt, C. A. (2009) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.1568 · Cited by 1,844
Initiation of Protein Synthesis in Bacteria
Laursen, B. S., Sørensen, H. P., Mortensen, K. K., & Sperling-Petersen, H. U. (2005) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.69.1.101-123.2005 · Cited by 616
Francis, K. P., Joh, D., Bellinger-Kawahara, C., Hawkinson, M. J., Purchio, T. F., & Contag, P. R. (2000) · Infection and Immunity · doi:10.1128/iai.68.6.3594-3600.2000 · Cited by 339
An Automated Model Test System for Systematic Development and Improvement of Gene Expression Models
Reis, A. C., & Salis, H. M. (2020) · ACS Synthetic Biology · doi:10.1021/acssynbio.0c00394 · Cited by 166
Pervasive translation in Mycobacterium tuberculosis
Smith, C., Canestrari, J. G., Wang, A. J., Champion, M. M., Derbyshire, K. M., Gray, T. A., & Wade, J. T. (2022) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.73980 · Cited by 71
Metadata
- Authors
- Vellanoweth, R. L., & Rabinowitz, J. C.
- Venue
- Molecular Microbiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-05
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1105-1114
- ISSN
- 0950-382X (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2958
- OpenAlex
- W2107148353
- Cited by
- 308
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The influence of ribosome‐binding‐site elements on translational efficiency in Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli in vivo. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2958.1992.tb01548.x
- The paper
- Vellanoweth, R. L., & Rabinowitz, J. C. (1992). The influence of ribosome‐binding‐site elements on translational efficiency in Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli in vivo. Molecular Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.1992.tb01548.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.