The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Phage‐exclusion enzymes: a bonanza of biochemical and cell biology reagents?
Abstract
Summary: Many parasitic DNA elements including prophages and plasmids synthesize proteins that kill the cell after infection by other phages, thereby blocking the multiplication of the infecting phages and their spread to other nearby cells. The only known function of these proteins is to exclude the infecting phage, and therefore to protect their hosts, and thereby the DNA elements themselves, against phage contagion. Many of these exclusions have been studied extensively and some have long been used in molecular genetics, but their molecular basis was unknown. The most famous of the phage exclusions are those caused by the Rex proteins of λ prophage. The Rex exclusions are still not completely understood, but recent evidence has begun to lead to more specific models for their action. One of the Rex proteins, RexA, may be activated by a DNA‐protein complex, perhaps a recombination or replication intermediate, produced after phage infection. In the activated state, RexA may activate RexB, which has been proposed to be a membrane ion channel that allows the passage of monovalent cations, destroying the cellular membrane potential, and killing the cell. We now understand two other phage exclusions at the molecular level which use strategies that are remarkably similar to each other. The parasitic DNA elements responsible for the exclusions both constitutively synthesize enzymes that are inactive as synthesized by the DNA element but are activated after phage infection by a short peptide determinant encoded by the infecting phage. In the activated state, the enzymes cleave evolutionarily conserved components of the translation apparatus, in one case EF‐Tu, and in the other case tRNA Lys. Translation is blocked and development of the phage is arrested. A myriad of different phage‐exclusion systems are known to exist and many of these may also be specific for highly conserved cellular components, furnishing generally useful enzymes for biochemical and biomedical research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Programmed Cell Death in Animal Development
Jacobson, M. D., Weil, M., & Raff, M. C. (1997) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81873-5 · Cited by 2,698
The arms race between bacteria and their phage foes
Hampton, H. G., Watson, B. N. J., & Fineran, P. C. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1894-8 · Cited by 917
Revenge of the phages: defeating bacterial defences
Samson, J. E., Magadán, A. H., Sabri, M., & Moineau, S. (2013) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro3096 · Cited by 698
Lewis, K. (2000) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.64.3.503-514.2000 · Cited by 616
The phage‐host arms race: Shaping the evolution of microbes
Stern, A., & Sorek, R. (2011) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.201000071 · Cited by 527
Metadata
- Authors
- Snyder, L.
- Venue
- Molecular Microbiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-02
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 415-420
- ISSN
- 0950-382X (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2958
- OpenAlex
- W2056876004
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phage‐exclusion enzymes: a bonanza of biochemical and cell biology reagents? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2958.1995.tb02255.x
- The paper
- Snyder, L. (1995). Phage‐exclusion enzymes: a bonanza of biochemical and cell biology reagents? Molecular Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.1995.tb02255.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.