The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Molecular basis of intercellular adhesion in the biofilm‐forming Staphylococcus epidermidis
Abstract
Summary: The Staphylococcus epidermidis genes icaABC are involved in the synthesis of the polysaccharide intercellular adhesin (PIA), which is located mainly on the cell surface, as shown by immunofluorescence studies with PIA‐specific antiserum. PIA was shown to be a linear β‐1,6‐linked glucosaminoglycan composed of at least 130 2‐deoxy‐2‐amino‐D‐glucopyrano‐syl residues of which 80–85% are N‐acetylated, the rest being non‐N‐acetylated and positively charged. A transposon insertion in the icaABC gene cluster (ica, intercellular adhesion) led to the loss of several traits, such as the ability to form a biofilm on a polystyrene surface, cell aggregation, and PIA production. The mutant could be complemented by transformation with the IcaABC‐carrying plasmid pCN27. Transfer of pCN27 into the heterologous host Staphylococcus carnosus led to the formation of large cell aggregates, the formation of a biofilm on a glass surface, and PIA expression. The nucleotide sequence of icaABC suggests that the three genes are organized in an operon and that they are co‐transcribed from the mapped ica A promoter. Ica A contains four potential transmembrane helices, indicative of a membrane location. The deduced Ica A sequence shows similarity to those of polysaccharide‐polymerizing enzymes, the most pronounced being with a Rhizobium meliloti N‐acetylglucosaminyltransferase involved in lipo‐chitin biosynthesis (22.5% overall identity and 37.4% overall similarity). This similarity suggests that Ica A has N‐acetylglucosaminyltransferase activity in the formation
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Basic local alignment search tool
Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W., & Lipman, D. J. (1990) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1990.9999 · Cited by 98,669
Improved tools for biological sequence comparison.
Pearson, W. R., & Lipman, D. J. (1988) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.85.8.2444 · Cited by 11,227
Cited by
Biofilm formation as microbial development
O'Toole, G., Kaplan, H. B., & Kolter, R. (2000) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.54.1.49 · Cited by 3,571
Bacterial adhesion: seen any good biofilms lately
Dunne, W. M. (2002) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.15.2.155-166.2002 · Cited by 1,516
Baddour, L. M., Epstein, A. E., Erickson, C. C., Knight, B. P., Levison, M. E., Lockhart, P. B., Masoudi, F. A., Okum, E. J., Wilson, W. R., Beerman, L. B., et al. (2010) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.109.192665 · Cited by 1,030
Sharma, S., Mohler, J., Mahajan, S. D., Schwartz, S. A., Bruggemann, L., & Aalinkeel, R. (2023) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms11061614 · Cited by 993
[6] Genetic approaches to study of biofilms
O'Toole, G. A., Pratt, L. A., Watnick, P. I., Newman, D. K., Weaver, V. B., & Kolter, R. (1999) · Methods in Enzymology · doi:10.1016/s0076-6879(99)10008-9 · Cited by 835
Metadata
- Authors
- Heilmann, C., Schweitzer, O., Gerke, C., Vanittanakom, N., Mack, D., & Götz, F.
- Venue
- Molecular Microbiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1996-06
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1083-1091
- ISSN
- 0950-382X (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2958
- OpenAlex
- W2111154143
- Cited by
- 922
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular basis of intercellular adhesion in the biofilm‐forming Staphylococcus epidermidis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2958.1996.tb02548.x
- The paper
- Heilmann, C., Schweitzer, O., Gerke, C., Vanittanakom, N., Mack, D., & Götz, F. (1996). Molecular basis of intercellular adhesion in the biofilm‐forming Staphylococcus epidermidis. Molecular Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.1996.tb02548.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.