Cited by 1,516Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensingBiochemical and Structural CharacterizationBacterial Genetics and Biotechnology

Bacterial adhesion: seen any good biofilms lately

Open access
Dunne, W. Michael·2002·Clinical Microbiology Reviews

Abstract

The process of surface adhesion and biofilm development is a survival strategy employed by virtually all bacteria and refined over millions of years. This process is designed to anchor microorganisms in a nutritionally advantageous environment and to permit their escape to greener pastures when essential growth factors have been exhausted. Bacterial attachment to a surface can be divided into several distinct phases, including primary and reversible adhesion, secondary and irreversible adhesion, and biofilm formation. Each of these phases is ultimately controlled by the expression of one or more gene products. Ultrastructurally, the mature bacterial biofilm resembles an underwater coral reef containing pyramidal or mushroom-shaped microcolonies of organisms embedded within an extracellular glycocalyx, with channels and cavities to allow the exchange of nutrients and waste. The biofilm protects its inhabitants from predators, dehydration, biocides, and other environmental extremes while regulating population growth and diversity through primitive cell signals. From a physiological standpoint, surface-bound bacteria behave quite differently from their planktonic counterparts. Recognizing that bacteria naturally occur as surface-bound and often polymicrobic communities, the practice of performing antimicrobial susceptibility tests using pure cultures and in a planktonic growth mode should be questioned. That this model does not reflect conditions found in nature might help explain the difficulties encountered in the management and treatment of biomedical implant infections.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/cmr.15.2.155-166.2002

Cites

100 of 100 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Autoaggregation can lead to microcolony formation and biofilm in two ways: single planktonic cells attach to the substrate and recruit other cells from suspension via autoagglutinins, or cells autoaggregate in solution and the aggregates settle on the substrate to initiate biofilm formation.

    “Autoaggregation can lead to microcolony formation and biofilm in two ways (Figure 3). In the first, single planktonic cells attach to the substrate. This depends on expression of surface adhesins and possibly also motility factors [46]. Following this, these cells recruit other cells from suspension via autoagglutinins, leading to microcolony formation [75],[94].”

    From Bacterial autoaggregation (2018) · cites this paper as [94]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. In H. M. Lappin-Scott and J. W. Costerton (ed.), Microbial biofilms, 1st ed. Cambridge University Press, New York, N.Y.
  2. In Y. H. An and R. J. Friedman (ed.), Handbook of bacterial adhesion: principles, methods, and applications, 1st ed. Humana Press, Totowa, N.J.
  3. Gerke, C., A. Kraft, R. Süssmuth, O. Schweitzer, and F. Götz. 1998. Char- acterization of the N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase activity in the biosyn- thesis of the Staphylococcus epidermidis intercellular adhesin. J. Biol. Chem. 273:18586-18593.
  4. In H. M. Lappin- Scott and J. W. Costerton (ed.), Microbial biofilms, 1st ed. Cambridge University Press, New York, N.Y.
  5. In H. M. Lappin-Scott and J. W. Costerton (ed.), Microbial biofilms. Cambridge University Press, New York, N.Y.
  6. In D. C. Savage and M. Fletcher (ed.), Bacterial adhesion: mechanisms and physiological significance. Plenum Press, New York, N.Y.
  7. In H. M. Lappin-Scott and J. W. Costerton (ed.), Microbial biofilms, 1st ed. Cambridge University Press, New York, N.Y.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dunne, W. M.
Affiliations
Barnes-Jewish Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Dunne, W. Michael
Venue
Clinical Microbiology Reviews
Published
2002-04
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
155-166
ISSN
  • 0893-8512 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-6618
OpenAlex
W2128578655
Cited by
1,516
References
100
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 76 · 2022: 79 · 2021: 87 · 2020: 75 · 2019: 90 · 2018: 83 · 2017: 81 · 2016: 82 · 2015: 90 · 2014: 94 · 2013: 82 · 2012: 82
FWCI
11.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Microbiology Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons@Becker (Washington University School of Medicine) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biochemical and Structural Characterization
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Keywords
bacterial adhesion, biofilm formation, reversible adhesion, microcolonies, biofilm physiology, polymicrobial communities, antimicrobial susceptibility testing, bacterial survival strategies
MeSH terms
Bacterial Adhesion, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Biofilms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review