The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
New insights into the pneumococcal fratricide: relationship to clumping and identification of a novel immunity factor
Abstract
Summary: In 1971, Tomasz and Zanati discovered that competent pneumococci have a tendency to form aggregates when pelleted by centrifugation and resuspended in 0.01 N HCl by brief vortexing. Interestingly, no clumping was observed with parallel cultures of non‐competent cells treated in the same way. We set out to elucidate the mechanism behind this striking phenomenon, and were able to show that it depends on extracellular DNA that is presumably released by so‐called competence‐induced cell lysis. Competence‐induced cell lysis, which was first described a few years ago, seems to rely on the concerted action of several murein hydrolases. Our results confirmed and extended previous findings by showing that competence‐induced aggregation is abolished in a lytA–lytC double mutant, and absolutely requires CbpD and its N‐terminal CHAP amidase domain. Furthermore, we discovered a novel competence stimulating peptide (CSP)‐induced immunity protein, encoded by the early competence gene comM (spr1762), which protects competent pneumococci against their own lysins. Together, the murein hydrolases and the immunity protein constitutes a CSP‐controlled mechanism that allows competent pneumococci to commit fratricide by killing non‐competent pneumococci sharing the same ecological niche. Through such predatory behaviour, pneumococci can get access to transforming DNA and nutrients, promote the release of virulence factors, and at the same time get rid of competitors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Anantharaman, V., & Aravind, L. (2003) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2003-4-2-r11 · Cited by 365
Cited by
Antibiotic Stress Induces Genetic Transformability in the Human Pathogen Streptococcus pneumoniae
Prudhomme, M., Attaiech, L., Sanchez, G., Martin, B., & Claverys, J.-P. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1127912 · Cited by 451
Self-citationMolecular control of bacterial death and lysis
Rice, K. C., & Bayles, K. W. (2008) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00030-07 · Cited by 362
Vermassen, A., Leroy, S., Talon, R., Provot, C., Popowska, M., & Desvaux, M. (2019) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2019.00331 · Cited by 348
Thomas, V. C., Hiromasa, Y., Harms, N., Thurlow, L., Tomich, J., & Hancock, L. E. (2009) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06703.x · Cited by 197
Quorum Sensing Regulation of Competence and Bacteriocins in Streptococcus pneumoniae and mutans
Shanker, E., & Federle, M. (2017) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes8010015 · Cited by 176
Metadata
- Authors
- Håvarstein, L. S., Martin, B., Johnsborg, O., Granadel, C., & Claverys, J.
- Venue
- Molecular Microbiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-12-20
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1297-1037
- ISSN
- 0950-382X (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2958
- OpenAlex
- W1963695230
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New insights into the pneumococcal fratricide: relationship to clumping and identification of a novel immunity factor. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.05021.x
- The paper
- Håvarstein, L. S., Martin, B., Johnsborg, O., Granadel, C., & Claverys, J. (2006). New insights into the pneumococcal fratricide: relationship to clumping and identification of a novel immunity factor. Molecular Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.05021.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.