The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cyclic‐di‐GMP‐mediated signalling within the σS network of Escherichia coli
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Bis‐(3′−5′)‐cyclic‐di‐guanosine monophosphate (c‐di‐GMP) is a bacterial signalling molecule produced by diguanylate cyclases (DGC, carrying GGDEF domains) and degraded by specific phosphodiesterases (PDE, carrying EAL domains). Neither its full physiological impact nor its effector mechanisms are currently understood. Also, the existence of multiple GGDEF/EAL genes in the genomes of most species raises questions about output specificity and robustness of c‐di‐GMP signalling. Using microarray and gene fusion analyses, we demonstrate that at least five of the 29 GGDEF/EAL genes in Escherichia coli are not only stationary phase‐induced under the control of the general stress response master regulator σ S (RpoS), but also exhibit differential control by additional environmental and temporal signals. Two of the corresponding proteins, YdaM (GGDEF only) and YciR (GGDEF + EAL), which in vitro show DGC and PDE activity, respectively, play an antagonistic role in the expression of the biofilm‐associated curli fimbriae. This control occurs at the level of transcription of the curli and cellulose regulator CsgD. Moreover, we show that H‐NS positively affects curli expression by inversely controlling the expression of ydaM and yciR. Furthermore, we demonstrate a temporally fine‐tuned GGDEF cascade in which YdaM controls the expression of another GGDEF protein, YaiC. By genome‐wide microarray analysis, evidence is provided that YdaM and YciR strongly and nearly exclusively control CsgD‐regulated genes. We conclude that specific GGDEF/EAL proteins have very distinct expression patterns, and when present in physiological amounts, can act in a highly precise, non‐global and perhaps microcompartmented manner on a few or even a single specific target(s).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bacterial polymers: biosynthesis, modifications and applications
Rehm, B. H. A. (2010) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2354 · Cited by 899
The developmental model of microbial biofilms: ten years of a paradigm up for review
Monds, R. D., & O’Toole, G. A. (2009) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2008.11.001 · Cited by 532
Barraud, N., Schleheck, D., Klebensberger, J., Webb, J. S., Hassett, D. J., Rice, S. A., & Kjelleberg, S. (2009) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.00975-09 · Cited by 513
A Molecular Description of Cellulose Biosynthesis
McNamara, J. T., Morgan, J. L. W., & Zimmer, J. (2015) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-060614-033930 · Cited by 382
Klebensberger, J., Lautenschlager, K., Bressler, D., Wingender, J., & Philipp, B. (2007) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01339.x · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Authors
- Weber, H., Pesavento, C., Possling, A., Tischendorf, G., & Hengge, R.
- Venue
- Molecular Microbiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-10-13
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1014-1034
- ISSN
- 0950-382X (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2958
- OpenAlex
- W2114051710
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cyclic‐di‐GMP‐mediated signalling within the σS network of Escherichia coli. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05440.x
- The paper
- Weber, H., Pesavento, C., Possling, A., Tischendorf, G., & Hengge, R. (2006). Cyclic‐di‐GMP‐mediated signalling within the σS network of Escherichia coli. Molecular Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05440.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.