The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CcpA‐mediated repression of Clostridium difficile toxin gene expression
Open accessAbstract
Summary: The presence of glucose or other rapidly metabolizable carbon sources in the bacterial growth medium strongly represses Clostridium difficile toxin synthesis independently of strain origin. In Gram‐positive bacteria, carbon catabolite repression (CCR) is generally regarded as a regulatory mechanism that responds to carbohydrate availability. In the C. difficile genome all elements involved in CCR are present. To elucidate in vivo the role of CCR in C. difficile toxin synthesis, we used the ClosTron gene knockout system to construct mutants of strain JIR8094 that were unable to produce the major components of the CCR signal transduction pathway: the phosphotransferase system (PTS) proteins (Enzyme I and HPr), the HPr kinase/phosphorylase (HprK/P) and the catabolite control protein A, CcpA. Inactivation of the ptsI, ptsH and ccpA genes resulted in derepression of toxin gene expression in the presence of glucose, whereas repression of toxin production was still observed in the hprK mutant, indicating that uptake of glucose is required for repression but that phosphorylation of HPr by HprK is not. C. difficile CcpA was found to bind to the regulatory regions of the tcdA and tcdB genes but not through a consensus cre site motif. Moreover in vivo and in vitro results confirmed that HPr‐Ser45‐P does not stimulate CcpA‐dependent binding to DNA targets. However, fructose‐1,6‐biphosphate (FBP) alone did increase CcpA binding affinity in the absence of HPr‐Ser45‐P. These results showed that CcpA represses toxin expression in response to PTS sugar availability, thus linking carbon source utilization to virulence gene expression in C. difficile.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Carbon catabolite repression in bacteria: many ways to make the most out of nutrients
Görke, B., & Stülke, J. (2008) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1932 · Cited by 1,701
A modular system for Clostridium shuttle plasmids
Heap, J. T., Pennington, O. J., Cartman, S. T., & Minton, N. P. (2009) · Journal of Microbiological Methods · doi:10.1016/j.mimet.2009.05.004 · Cited by 489
Cited by
Saujet, L., Monot, M., Dupuy, B., Soutourina, O., & Martin-Verstraete, I. (2011) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.00272-11 · Cited by 173
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Antunes, A., Martin‐Verstraete, I., & Dupuy, B.
- Venue
- Molecular Microbiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-12-28
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 882-899
- ISSN
- 0950-382X (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2958
- OpenAlex
- W1911807020
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CcpA‐mediated repression of Clostridium difficile toxin gene expression. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07495.x
- The paper
- Antunes, A., Martin‐Verstraete, I., & Dupuy, B. (2011). CcpA‐mediated repression of Clostridium difficile toxin gene expression. Molecular Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07495.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.