The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On the origin of fluorine in the Milky Way
Open accessAbstract
The main astrophysical factories of fluorine (19F) are thought to be Type II supernovae, Wolf–Rayet stars, and the asymptotic giant branch (AGB) of intermediate‐mass stars. We present a model for the chemical evolution of fluorine in the Milky Way using a semi‐analytic multizone chemical evolution model. For the first time, we demonstrate quantitatively the impact of fluorine nucleosynthesis in Wolf–Rayet and AGB stars. The inclusion of these latter two fluorine production sites provides a possible solution to the long‐standing discrepancy between model predictions and the fluorine abundances observed in Milky Way giants. Finally, fluorine is discussed as a possible probe of the role of supernovae and intermediate‐mass stars in the chemical evolution history of the globular cluster ω Centauri.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
AGB stars are important for fluorine.
“Similarly, Renda et al. (2004) and Kobayashi et al. (2011a) showed the importance of AGB stars for fluorine.”
From The Dawes Review 2: Nucleosynthesis and Stellar Yields of Low- and Intermediate-Mass Single Stars (2014) · cites this paper as Renda et al. 2004
Core collapse supernovae and stellar winds from Wolf Rayet stars are predicted to release F-enriched material into the ISM, alongside AGB stars.
“Core collapse supernovae (Woosley & Weaver 1995) and stellar winds from Wolf Rayet stars (Meynet & Arnould 2000) are both predicted to release F-enriched material into the ISM, alongside AGB stars (Renda et al. 2004).”
From The Dawes Review 2: Nucleosynthesis and Stellar Yields of Low- and Intermediate-Mass Single Stars (2014) · cites this paper as Renda et al. 2004
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 36
- Alibés, 2001, A&A, 370, 1103
- Allende Prieto, 2001, ApJ, 556, L63
- Bekki, 2003, MNRAS, 346, L11
- Bertelli, 2001, AJ, 121, 1013
- Cappellaro, 1999, A&A, 351, 459
- Cunha, 2003, AJ, 126, 1305
- Dray, 2003, MNRAS, 338, 973
- Fenner, 2003, PASA, 20, 189, 10.1071/AS02047 · DOI
- Forestini, 1992, A&A, 261, 157
- Frost, 1996, ApJ, 473, 383
- Frost, 1998, A&A, 332, L17
- Gibson, 2003, PASA, 20, 401, 10.1071/AS03052 · DOI
- Heger A. , Kolbe E. , Haxton W. C. , Langanke K. , Martinez-Pinedo G. , Woosley S. E. , 2004, preprint (astro-ph/0307546) · arXiv
- Holweger, 2001, Solar and Galactic Composition, 23
- Iglesias, 1996, ApJ, 464, 943
- Iwamoto, 1999, ApJS, 125, 439
- Jorissen, 1992, A&A, 261, 164
- Karakas, 2003, PASA, 20, 279, 10.1071/AS03010 · DOI
- Karakas, 2002, PASA, 19, 515, 10.1071/AS02013 · DOI · Paper page
- Kroupa, 1993, MNRAS, 262, 545, 10.1093/mnras/262.3.545 · DOI
- Limongi, 2003, ApJ, 592, 404
- Lugaro, 2004, ApJ
- Meynet, 2000, A&A, 355, 176
- Mowlavi, 1998, A&A, 334, 153
- Myra, 1990, ApJ, 364, 222
- Rana, 1991, ARA&A, 29, 129
- Renzini, 1981, A&A, 94, 175
- Russell, 1992, ApJ, 384, 508
- Schaller, 1992, A&AS, 96, 269
- Smith, 2003, Carnegie Observatories
- Timmes, 1995, ApJS, 98, 617
- Vassiliadis, 1993, ApJ, 413, 641
- Woosley, 1988, Nat, 334, 45
- Woosley, 1995, ApJS, 101, 181
- Woosley, 1990, ApJ, 356, 272
- Woosley, 2002, Rev. Mod. Phys., 74, 1015
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Dawes Review 2: Nucleosynthesis and Stellar Yields of Low- and Intermediate-Mass Single Stars
Karakas, A. I., & Lattanzio, J. C. (2014) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia · doi:10.1017/pasa.2014.21 · Cited by 735
“Similarly, Renda et al. (2004) and Kobayashi et al. (2011a) showed the importance of AGB stars for fluorine.”
BackgroundSelf-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Renda, A., Fenner, Y., Gibson, B. K., Karakas, A. I., Lattanzio, J. C., Campbell, S., Chieffi, A., Cunha, K., & Smith, V. V.
- Affiliations
- Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
- Monash University (AU)
- Astronomical Observatory of Rome (IT)
- The University of Texas at El Paso (US)
- Corresponding author
- Renda, Agostino
- ORCID
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-10
- Volume
- 354
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 575-580
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2083061365
- Cited by
- 92
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 4.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
- Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
- Keywords
- fluorine, 19F, chemical evolution, Milky Way, Wolf-Rayet stars, asymptotic giant branch, intermediate-mass stars, Type II supernovae, nucleosynthesis, giants, Omega Centauri, globular clusters
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review