The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Parameterising the Third Dredge-up in Asymptotic Giant Branch Stars
Open accessAbstract
We present new evolutionary sequences for low and intermediate mass stars (1−6 M ⊙ ) for three different metallicities, Z = 0.02, 0.008, and 0.004. We evolve the models from the pre-main sequence to the thermally-pulsing asymptotic giant branch phase. We have two sequences of models for each mass, one which includes mass loss and one without mass loss. Typically 20 or more pulses have been followed for each model, allowing us to calculate the third dredge-up parameter for each case. Using the results from this large and homogeneous set of models, we present an approximate fit for the core mass at the first thermal pulse, M c 1 , as well as for the third dredge-up efficiency parameter, λ, and the core mass at the first dredge-up episode, M c min , as a function of metallicity and total mass. We also examine the effect of a reduced envelope mass on the value of λ.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
At a given metallicity Z, λ increases with increasing stellar mass.
“The general trend is that λ increases with increasing stellar mass, at a given Z .”
From The Dawes Review 2: Nucleosynthesis and Stellar Yields of Low- and Intermediate-Mass Single Stars (2014) · cites this paper as Karakas et al. (2002)
Karakas et al. (2002) provided the first parameterisation of λ and M_min_c as functions of total mass, envelope mass, and metallicity.
“Karakas et al. (2002) provided the first parameterisation of λ and M min c as functions of the total mass, envelope mass, and metallicity”
From The Dawes Review 2: Nucleosynthesis and Stellar Yields of Low- and Intermediate-Mass Single Stars (2014) · cites this paper as Karakas et al. (2002)
The models of Karakas et al. (2002) do not predict any TDU for models less than 2 M⊙ at Z = 0.02 and quite efficient TDU for models of intermediate mass.
“the models of Karakas et al. (2002) do not predict any TDU for models less than 2 M ⊙ at Z = 0 . 02 and quite efficient TDU for models of intermediate mass.”
From The Dawes Review 2: Nucleosynthesis and Stellar Yields of Low- and Intermediate-Mass Single Stars (2014) · cites this paper as Karakas et al. (2002)
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 31
- Reimers, 1975, Problems in Stellar Atmospheres and Envelopes, 299
- Mowlavi, 1999, AandA, 344, 564
- Lugaro M. A. 2001, PhD Thesis, Monash University
- Busso, 1999, ARAandA, 37, 329
- Groenewegen, 1993, AandA, 267, 410
- 10.1017/S1323358000021895 · DOI
- 10.1086/303794 · DOI
- Marigo, 1996, AandA, 313, 194
- Frost, 1996, ApJ, 344, 25
- 10.1086/158921 · DOI
- 10.1086/159155 · DOI
- Marigo, 1998, Asymptotic Giant Branch Stars, 25
- Wallerstein, 1998, ARAandA, 36, 183
- Renzini, 1981, AandA, 94, 229
- 10.1086/173033 · DOI · Paper page
- Herwig, 1997, AandA, 324, 81
- Wagenhuber, 1998, AandA, 340, 332
- 10.1086/177381 · DOI
- Langer, 1999, AandA, 346, 943
- 10.1086/164451 · DOI · Paper page
- Herwig, 2000, AandA, 360, 952
- Marigo, 2001, AandA, 370, 53
- Iben, 1991, Evolution of Stars: The Photospheric Abundance Connection, 278
- Pols, 2001, Salting the Early Soup: Trace Nuclei from Stars to the Solar System, 72, 617
- 10.1086/185522 · DOI
- Frost C. A. 1997, PhD Thesis, Monash University
- van den Hoek, 1997, AandASS, 123, 311
- 10.1086/166324 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05038.x · DOI
- Marigo, 1998, AandA, 331, 545
- Vassiliadis E. 1992, PhD Thesis, Australian National University
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Dawes Review 2: Nucleosynthesis and Stellar Yields of Low- and Intermediate-Mass Single Stars
Karakas, A. I., & Lattanzio, J. C. (2014) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia · doi:10.1017/pasa.2014.21 · Cited by 735
“Stancliffe et al. (2005) were able to reproduce the CSLF of the LMC by computing AGB models without convective overshoot using the Cambridge STARS code, which predicts deeper TDU at smaller core masses than Straniero et al. (1997) or Karakas et al. (2002).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSelf-citationStellar Models and Yields of Asymptotic Giant Branch Stars
Karakas, A., & Lattanzio, J. C. (2007) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia · doi:10.1071/as07021 · Cited by 312
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Karakas, A. I., Lattanzio, J. C., & Pols, O. R.
- Affiliations
- Monash University (AU)
- Utrecht University (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Karakas, A. I.
- Venue
- Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2002
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 515-526
- ISSN
- 1323-3580 (ISSN-L)
- 1448-6083
- OpenAlex
- W2170121698
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 4.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Keywords
- third dredge-up, asymptotic giant branch stars, thermally pulsing AGB, stellar evolution models, metallicity dependence, mass loss, thermal pulses, core mass, envelope mass, low- and intermediate-mass stars
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review