Correcting systematic effects in a large set of photometric light curves
Open accessAbstract
We suggest a new algorithm to remove systematic effects in a large set of light curves obtained by a photometric survey. The algorithm can remove systematic effects, such as those associated with atmospheric extinction, detector efficiency, or point spread function changes over the detector. The algorithm works without any prior knowledge of the effects, as long as they linearly appear in many stars of the sample. The approach, which was originally developed to remove atmospheric extinction effects, is based on a lower rank approximation of matrices, an approach which has already been suggested and used in chemometrics, for example. The proposed algorithm is especially useful in cases where the uncertainties of the measurements are unequal. For equal uncertainties, the algorithm reduces to the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) algorithm. We present a simulation to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm and we point out its potential, in the search for transit candidates in particular.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The WASP Project and the SuperWASP Cameras
Pollacco, D. L., Skillen, I., Cameron, A. C., Christian, D. J., Hellier, C., Irwin, J., Lister, T. A., Street, R. A., West, R. G., Anderson, D., et al. (2006) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · doi:10.1086/508556 · Cited by 1,244 · see citing works
Short period eclipsing binary candidates identified using SuperWASP
Norton, A. J., Payne, S. G., Evans, T., West, R. G., Wheatley, P. J., Anderson, D. R., Barros, S. C. C., Butters, O. W., Collier Cameron, A., Christian, D. J., et al. (2011) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201116448 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Analysis of 1SWASP J140747.93−394542.6 eclipse fine-structure: hints of exomoons
van Werkhoven, T. I. M., Kenworthy, M. A., & Mamajek, E. E. (2014) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stu725 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Periodic eclipses of the young star PDS 110 discovered with WASP and KELT photometry
Osborn, H. P., Rodriguez, J. E., Kenworthy, M. A., Kennedy, G. M., Mamajek, E. E., Robinson, C. E., Espaillat, C. C., Armstrong, D. J., Shappee, B. J., Bieryla, A., et al. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1249 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
- Authors
- Tamuz, O., Mazeh, T., & Zucker, S.
- Affiliations
- Tel Aviv University (IL)
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-02
- Volume
- 356
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1466-1470
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2141599824
- Cited by
- 534
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 13.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- reroDoc Digital Library (submittedVersion)
- CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Astronomical Observations and Instrumentation
- Keywords
- systematic effects, light curves, atmospheric extinction, detector efficiency, point spread function, low-rank approximation, principal component analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review