Cited by 348Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaStellar, planetary, and galactic studies

Modified Newtonian dynamics in the Milky Way

Open access
Famaey, B., Binney, J.·2005·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

Both microlensing surveys and radio-frequency observations of gas flow imply that the inner Milky Way is completely dominated by baryons, contrary to the predictions of standard cold dark matter (CDM) cosmology. We investigate the predictions of the modified Newtonian dynamics (MOND) formula for the Galaxy given the measured baryon distribution. Satisfactory fits to the observationally determined terminal-velocity curve are obtained for different choices of MOND's interpolating function μ(x). However, with simple analytical forms of μ(x), the local circular speed υc(R0) can be as large as 220 km s−1 only for values of the parameter a0 that are excluded by observations of NGC 3198. Only a numerically specified interpolating function can produce υc(R0) = 220 km s−1, which is therefore an upper limit in MOND, while the asymptotic velocity is predicted to be υc(∞) = 170 ± 5 km s−1. The data are probably not consistent with the functional form of μ(x) that has been explored as a toy model in the framework of Bekenstein's covariant theory of gravity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09474.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Famaey, B., & Binney, J.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2005-10-21
Volume
363
Issue
2
Pages
603-608
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W2095759197
Cited by
348
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 24
FWCI
14.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Keywords
MOND, Milky Way rotation curve, baryonic mass distribution, dark matter, shape functions, gravitational microlensing, NGC 3198

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review