The DOI matches its Crossref record; 81 of the 81 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Systematic errors in future weak-lensing surveys: requirements and prospects for self-calibration
Open accessAbstract
We study the impact of systematic errors on planned weak-lensing surveys and compute the requirements on their contributions so that they are not a dominant source of the cosmological parameter error budget. The generic types of error we consider are multiplicative and additive errors in measurements of shear, as well as photometric redshift errors. In general, more powerful surveys have stronger systematic requirements. For example, for a SuperNova/Acceleration Probe (SNAP)-type survey the multiplicative error in shear needs to be smaller than 1 per cent of the mean shear in any given redshift bin, while the centroids of photometric redshift bins need to be known to be better than 0.003. With about a factor of 2 degradation in cosmological parameter errors, future surveys can enter a self-calibration regime, where the mean systematic biases are self-consistently determined from the survey and only higher order moments of the systematics contribute. Interestingly, once the power-spectrum measurements are combined with the bispectrum, the self-calibration regime in the variation of the equation of state of dark energy wa is attained with only a 20-30 per cent error degradation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Higher-order shear and galaxy statistics and shear peak counts can improve dark energy constraints and provide self-calibration of various systematics ( Takada & Jain 2004; Dolney et al. 2006; Huterer et al. 2006; Petri et al. 2016 ) .”
From LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products (2019) · cites this paper as Huterer et al. 2006
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mathematical Methods for Physicists
Arfken, G. B., & Mathews, J. (1972) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1988084 · Cited by 4,069
Bartelmann, M., & Schneider, P. (2001) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/s0370-1573(00)00082-x · Cited by 2,611
Exploring the Expansion History of the Universe
Linder, E. V. (2003) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.90.091301 · Cited by 2,526
ACCELERATING UNIVERSES WITH SCALING DARK MATTER
CHEVALLIER, M., & POLARSKI, D. (2001) · International Journal of Modern Physics D · doi:10.1142/s0218271801000822 · Cited by 2,490
Large-scale structure of the Universe and cosmological perturbation theory
Bernardeau, F., Colombi, S., GAZTAÑAGA, E., & Scoccimarro, R. (2002) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/s0370-1573(02)00135-7 · Cited by 2,112
Stable clustering, the halo model and non-linear cosmological power spectra
Smith, R. E., Peacock, J. A., Jenkins, A., White, S. D. M., Frenk, C. S., Pearce, F. R., Thomas, P. A., Efstathiou, G., & Couchman, H. M. P. (2003) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06503.x · Cited by 2,054
Mathematical Methods for Physicists
Chow, T. L. (2000) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511755781 · Cited by 1,338
Accelerating Universes with Scaling Dark Matter
Chevallier, M., & Polarski, D. (2001) · HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · Cited by 1,075
Power Spectra for Cold Dark Matter and Its Variants
Eisenstein, D. J., & Hu, W. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/306640 · Cited by 910
Detection of weak gravitational lensing by large-scale structure
Bacon, D., Refregier, A. R., & Ellis, R. S. (2000) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03851.x · Cited by 623
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- 1997, AA, 322, 1
- 2003, PHYS REV D, 66, 083515
- 2003, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 347, 909
- 2000, AA, 358, 30
- 2005, APJ, 616, 75L
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–407 of 407
KiDS + VIKING-450 cosmology with Bayesian hierarchical model redshift distributions
Kyriacou, G. T., Mootoovaloo, A., Heavens, A., Jaffe, A. H., Leclercq, F., & Kuijken, K. H. (2026) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stag934
Berlfein, F., Mandelbaum, R., Xu, J., & Zhang, T. (2026) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stag1032
Enhancing photometric redshift estimation for LSST with a hybrid LSTM-mixture density network
Luo, Z., Li, Y., Luo, X., Xiao, H., Fang, W., Pei, W., Zhang, S., & Shu, C. (2026) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202660374
Probing the Baryonic Feedback Effect with CSST Weak Lensing and Future Fast Radio Burst Measurements
Feng, S., Gong, Y., Xiong, Q., 刘, X. 小. L., Lin, H., Hu, D., & Chen, X. (2026) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae9a9c
“The observed shear power spectrum ˜ C ij for the i th and j th tomographic bins at a given multipole ℓ can be written as ( D. Huterer et al. 2006 where the multiplicative bias parameters m i and m j are introduced for each tomographic bin to account for systematic uncertainties in cosmic shear…”
Appendices and photo-z catalogs in CLAP. I.
Lin, Q. (2024) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.13954480
Metadata
- Authors
- Huterer, D., Takada, M., Bernstein, G., & Jain, B.
- Affiliations
- Tohoku University (JP)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-02-11
- Volume
- 366
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 101-114
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2102084015
- Cited by
- 409
- References
- 78
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 34
- FWCI
- 14.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
- Keywords
- weak gravitational lensing, systematic errors, photometric redshift errors, self-calibration, dark energy equation of state, power spectrum, bispectrum
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
