The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The maximum stellar mass, star-cluster formation and composite stellar populations: Maximum stellar mass-cluster mass relation
Open accessAbstract
We demonstrate that the mass of the most massive star in a cluster correlates non-trivially with the cluster mass. A simple algorithm, according to which a cluster is filled up with stars that are chosen randomly from the standard initial mass function (IMF) but sorted with increasing mass, yields an excellent description of the observational data. Algorithms based on random sampling from the IMF without sorted adding are ruled out with a confidence larger than 0.9999. A physical explanation of this would be that a cluster forms by more-massive stars being consecutively added until the resulting feedback energy suffices to revert cloud contraction and stops further star formation. This has important implications for composite populations. For example, 104 clusters of mass 102 M⊙ will not produce the same IMF as one cluster with a mass of 106 M⊙. It also supports the notion that the integrated galaxial stellar IMF (IGIMF) should be steeper than the stellar IMF and that it should vary with the star formation rate of a galaxy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Star Formation in the Milky Way and Nearby Galaxies
Kennicutt, R. C., & Evans, N. J. (2012) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125610 · Cited by 2,902
On the Normalization of the Cosmic Star Formation History
Hopkins, A. M., & Beacom, J. F. (2006) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/506610 · Cited by 1,724
Progenitors of Core-Collapse Supernovae
Smartt, S. J. (2009) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101737 · Cited by 1,231
Lee, J. C., Gil de Paz, A., Tremonti, C., Kennicutt, R. C., Salim, S., Bothwell, M., Calzetti, D., Dalcanton, J., Dale, D., Engelbracht, C., et al. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/706/1/599 · Cited by 558
SUPERNOVA FEEDBACK EFFICIENCY AND MASS LOADING IN THE STARBURST AND GALACTIC SUPERWIND EXEMPLAR M82
Strickland, D. K., & Heckman, T. M. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/697/2/2030 · Cited by 386
Metadata
- Authors
- Weidner, C., & Kroupa, P.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-12-15
- Volume
- 365
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1333-1347
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W1765063229
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The maximum stellar mass, star-cluster formation and composite stellar populations: Maximum stellar mass-cluster mass relation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09824.x
- The paper
- Weidner, C., & Kroupa, P. (2005). The maximum stellar mass, star-cluster formation and composite stellar populations: Maximum stellar mass-cluster mass relation. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09824.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.