The DOI matches its Crossref record; 87 of the 87 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
SUPERNOVA FEEDBACK EFFICIENCY AND MASS LOADING IN THE STARBURST AND GALACTIC SUPERWIND EXEMPLAR M82
Open accessAbstract
We measure the net energy efficiency of supernova (SN) and stellar wind feedback in the starburst galaxy M82 and the degree of mass loading of the hot gas piston driving its superwind by comparing a large suite of one and two-dimensional hydrodynamical models to a set of observational constraints derived from hard X-ray observations of the starburst region (the fluxes of the Heα and Lyα-like lines of S, Ar, Ca, and Fe, along with the total diffuse E = 2–8 keV X-ray luminosity). These are the first direct measurements of the feedback efficiency and mass loading of SN-heated and enriched plasma in a starburst galaxy. We consider a broad range of plausible parameters for the M82 starburst, varying the age and mode of star formation, the starburst region size and geometry, and SN metal yields. Over all these varied input parameters all the models that satisfy the existing observational constraints have medium to high thermalization efficiencies (30% ⩽ ⩽ 100%) and the volume-filling wind fluid that flows out of the starburst region is only mildly centrally mass loaded (1.0 ⩽ β ⩽ 2.8). These results imply a temperature of the plasma within the starburst region in the range 30–80 million Kelvin, a mass-flow rate of the wind fluid out of the starburst region of and a terminal velocity of the wind in the range v ∞ = 1410 − 2240 km s −1 . This velocity is considerably larger than the escape velocity from M82 ( v esc ≲ 460 km s −1 ) and the velocity of the Hα emitting clumps and filaments within M82's wind ( v Hα ∼ 600 km s −1 ). Drawing on these results we provide a prescription for implementing starburst-driven superwinds in cosmological models of galaxy formation and evolution that more accurately represents the energetics of the hot metal-enriched phases than the existing recipes do.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Abundances of the elements: Meteoritic and solar
Anders, E., & Grevesse, N. (1989) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/0016-7037(89)90286-x · Cited by 10,422
On the variation of the initial mass function
Kroupa, P. (2001) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04022.x · Cited by 7,499
STAR FORMATION IN GALAXIES ALONG THE HUBBLE SEQUENCE
Kennicutt, R. C. (1998) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.36.1.189 · Cited by 6,578
Starburst99: Synthesis Models for Galaxies with Active Star Formation
Leitherer, C., Schaerer, D., Goldader, J. D., Delgado, R. M. G., Robert, C., Kune, D. F., de Mello, D. F., Devost, D., & Heckman, T. M. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/313233 · Cited by 4,126
Self-citationThe Evolution and Explosion of Massive Stars. II. Explosive Hydrodynamics and Nucleosynthesis
Woosley, S. E., & Weaver, T. A. (1995) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/192237 · Cited by 3,761
Tremonti, C. A., Heckman, T. M., Kauffmann, G., Brinchmann, J., Charlot, S., White, S. D. M., Seibert, M., Peng, E. W., Schlegel, D. J., Uomoto, A., et al. (2004) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/423264 · Cited by 3,608
Self-citationCooling functions for low-density astrophysical plasmas
Sutherland, R. S., & Dopita, M. A. (1993) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/191823 · Cited by 2,434
Springel, V., & Hernquist, L. (2003) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06206.x · Cited by 2,262
Smith, R. K., Brickhouse, N. S., Liedahl, D. A., & Raymond, J. C. (2001) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/322992 · Cited by 2,085
McKee, C. F., & Ostriker, J. P. (1977) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/155667 · Cited by 2,082
Cited by
Tumlinson, J., Peeples, M. S., & Werk, J. K. (2017) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055240 · Cited by 1,147
Cool outflows in galaxies and their implications
Veilleux, S., Maiolino, R., Bolatto, A. D., & Aalto, S. (2020) · The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review · doi:10.1007/s00159-019-0121-9 · Cited by 466
Fermi Bubbles: Giant, Multibillion-Year-Old Reservoirs of Galactic Center Cosmic Rays
Crocker, R. M., & Aharonian, F. (2011) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.101102 · Cited by 242
THE FERMI BUBBLES. I. POSSIBLE EVIDENCE FOR RECENT AGN JET ACTIVITY IN THE GALAXY
Guo, F., & Mathews, W. G. (2012) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/756/2/181 · Cited by 231
Clustered supernovae drive powerful galactic winds after superbubble breakout
Fielding, D., Quataert, E., & Martizzi, D. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2466 · Cited by 162
Metadata
- Authors
- Strickland, D. K., & Heckman, T. M.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2009-05-18
- Volume
- 697
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 2030-2056
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2032204162
- Cited by
- 386
- References
- 87
- FWCI
- 10.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SUPERNOVA FEEDBACK EFFICIENCY AND MASS LOADING IN THE STARBURST AND GALACTIC SUPERWIND EXEMPLAR M82. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/697/2/2030
- The paper
- Strickland, D. K., & Heckman, T. M. (2009). SUPERNOVA FEEDBACK EFFICIENCY AND MASS LOADING IN THE STARBURST AND GALACTIC SUPERWIND EXEMPLAR M82. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/697/2/2030
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.