Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 280

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The dependence of clustering on galaxy properties

Open access
Li, Cheng, Kauffmann, Guinevere, Jing, Y. P., White, Simon D. M., Börner, Gerhard, Cheng, F. Z.·2006·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

We use a sample of ∼200 000 galaxies drawn from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) with 0.01 < z < 0.3 and −23 < M 0.1r < −16 to study how clustering depends on properties such as stellar mass (M*), colour (g−r), 4000-Å break strength (D4000), concentration index (C), and stellar surface mass density (μ*). Our measurements of wp(rp) as a function of the r-band luminosity are in excellent agreement with the previous two-degree Field Galaxy Redshift Survey and SDSS analyses. We compute wp(rp) as a function of stellar mass and we find that more-massive galaxies cluster more strongly than less-massive galaxies, with the difference increasing above the characteristic stellar mass M* of the Schechter mass function. We then divide our sample according to colour, 4000-Å break strength, concentration and surface density. As expected, galaxies with redder colours, larger 4000-Å break strengths, higher concentrations and larger surface mass densities cluster more strongly. The clustering differences are largest on small scales and for low-mass galaxies. At fixed stellar mass, the dependences of clustering on colour and 4000-Å break strength are similar. Different results are obtained when galaxies are split by concentration or surface density. The dependence of wp(rp) on g−r and D4000 extends out to physical scales that are significantly larger than those of individual dark matter haloes (>5 h−1 Mpc). This large-scale clustering dependence is not seen for the parameters C or μ*. On small scales (<1 h−1 Mpc), the amplitude of the correlation function is constant for ‘young’ galaxies with 1.1 < D4000 < 1.5 and a steeply rising function of age for ‘older’ galaxies with D4000 > 1.5. In contrast, the dependence of the amplitude of wp(rp) on concentration on scales less than 1 h−1 Mpc is strongest for disc-dominated galaxies with C < 2.6. This demonstrates that different processes are required to explain environmental trends in the structure and in the star formation history of galaxies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10066.x

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 280

Metadata

Authors
Li, C., Kauffmann, G., Jing, Y. P., White, S. D. M., Börner, G., & Cheng, F. Z.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2006-03-30
Volume
368
Issue
1
Pages
21-36
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W2157593344
Cited by
280
References
5
FWCI
11.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The dependence of clustering on galaxy properties. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10066.x
The paper
Li, C., Kauffmann, G., Jing, Y. P., White, S. D. M., Börner, G., & Cheng, F. Z. (2006). The dependence of clustering on galaxy properties. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10066.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.