Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 890

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Elemental abundance survey of the Galactic thick disc

Open access
Reddy, B. E., Lambert, D. L., Prieto, C. A.·2006·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

We have performed an abundance analysis for F-and G-dwarfs of the Galactic thick-disc component.A sample of 176 nearby (d 150 pc) thick-disc candidate stars was chosen from the Hipparcos catalogue and subjected to a high-resolution spectroscopic analysis.Using accurate radial velocities combined with the Hipparcos astrometry, kinematics (U, V and W) and Galactic orbital parameters were computed.We estimate the probability for a star to belong to the thin disc, the thick disc or the halo.With a probability P 70 per cent taken as certain membership, we assigned 95 stars to the thick disc, 13 to the thin disc, and 20 to the halo.The remaining 48 stars in the sample cannot be assigned with reasonable certainty to one of the three components.Abundances of C, O, Na, Mg, Al, Si, Ca, Sc, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Y, Ba, Ce, Nd and Eu have been obtained.The abundances for the thick-disc stars are compared with those for the thin-disc members from Reddy et al.The ratios of α-elements (O, Mg, Si, Ca and Ti) to iron for thick-disc stars show a clear enhancement compared to thin-disc members in the range -0.3 < [Fe/H] < -1.2.There are also other elements -Al, Sc, V, Co, and possibly Zn -which show enhanced ratios to iron in the thick disc relative to the thin disc.The abundances of Na, Cr, Mn, Ni and Cu (relative to Fe) are very similar for thin-and thick-disc stars.The dispersion in abundance ratios [X/Fe] at given [Fe/H] for thick-disc stars is consistent with the expected scatter due to measurement errors, suggesting a lack of 'cosmic' scatter.A few stars classified as members of the thick disc by our kinematic criteria show thin-disc abundances.These stars, which appear older than most thin-disc stars, are also, on average, younger than the thick-disc population.They may have originated early in the thin-disc history, and been subsequently scattered to hotter orbits by collisions.The thick disc may not include stars with [Fe/H] > -0.3.The observed compositions of the thin and thick discs seem to be consistent with the models of galaxy formation by hierarchical clustering in a Lambda cold dark matter ( CDM) universe.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10148.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 890

Metadata

Authors
Reddy, B. E., Lambert, D. L., & Prieto, C. A.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2006-04-21
Volume
367
Issue
4
Pages
1329-1366
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W1980935497
Cited by
890
References
2
FWCI
20.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Elemental abundance survey of the Galactic thick disc. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10148.x
The paper
Reddy, B. E., Lambert, D. L., & Prieto, C. A. (2006). Elemental abundance survey of the Galactic thick disc. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10148.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.