The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Star cluster disruption by giant molecular clouds
Open accessAbstract
We investigate encounters between giant molecular clouds (GMCs) and star clusters. We propose a single expression for the energy gain of a cluster due to an encounter with a GMC, valid for all encounter distances and GMC properties. This relation is verified with N-body simulations of cluster–GMC encounters, where the GMC is represented by a moving analytical potential. Excellent agreement is found between the simulations and the analytical work for fractional energy gains of ΔE/|E0| < 10, where |E0| is the initial total cluster energy. The fractional mass loss from the cluster scales with the fractional energy gain as (ΔM/M0) =f(ΔE/|E0|), where f≃ 0.25. This is because a fraction 1 −f of the injected energy goes to the velocities of escaping stars, that are higher than the escape velocity. We therefore suggest that the disruption time of clusters, tdis, is best defined as the time needed to bring the cluster mass to zero, instead of the time needed to inject the initial cluster energy. We derive an expression for tdis based on the mass loss from the simulations, taking into account the effect of gravitational focusing by the GMC. Assuming spatially homogeneous distributions of clusters and GMCs with a relative velocity dispersion of σcn, we find that clusters lose most of their mass in relatively close encounters with high relative velocities (∼2σcn). The disruption time depends on the cluster mass (Mc) and half-mass radius (rh) as tdis= 2.0 S(Mc/104 M⊙)(3.75 pc/rh)3 Gyr, with S≡ 1 for the solar neighbourhood and S scales with the surface density of individual GMCs (Σn) and the global GMC density (ρn) as S∝ (Σnρn)−1. Combined with the observed relation between rh and Mc, that is, rh∝Mλc, tdis depends on Mc as tdis∝Mγc. The index γ is then defined as γ= 1 − 3λ. The observed shallow relation between cluster radius and mass (e.g. λ≃ 0.1), makes the value of the index γ= 0.7 similar to that found from observations and from simulations of clusters dissolving in tidal fields (γ≃ 0.62). The constant of 2.0 Gyr, which is the disruption time of a 104 M⊙ cluster in the solar neighbourhood, is about a factor of 3.5 shorter than that found from earlier simulations of clusters dissolving under the combined effect of Galactic tidal field and stellar evolution. It is somewhat higher than the observationally determined value of 1.3 Gyr. It suggests, however, that the combined effect of tidal field and encounters with GMCs can explain the lack of old open clusters in the solar neighbourhood. GMC encounters can also explain the (very) short disruption time that was observed for star clusters in the central region of M51, since there ρn is an order of magnitude higher than that in the solar neighbourhood.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
On the variation of the initial mass function
Kroupa, P. (2001) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04022.x · Cited by 7,499
The structure of star clusters. I. an empirical density law
King, I. (1962) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/108756 · Cited by 1,996
On the Problem of Distribution in Globular Star Clusters: (Plate 8.)
Plummer, H. C. (1911) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/71.5.460 · Cited by 1,682
Mass, luminosity, and line width relations of Galactic molecular clouds
Solomon, P. M., Rivolo, A. R., Barrett, J., & Yahil, A. (1987) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/165493 · Cited by 1,611
Dynamical Evolution of Globular Clusters
Spitzer, L., & Freeman, K. C. (1988) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.2811501 · Cited by 774
Dynamical evolution of star clusters in tidal fields
Baumgardt, H., & Makino, J. (2003) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06286.x · Cited by 773
Self-citationA composite CO survey of the entire Milky Way
Dame, T. M., Ungerechts, H., Cohen, R. S., de Geus, E. J., Grenier, I. A., May, J., Murphy, D. C., Nyman, L.-A., & Thaddeus, P. (1987) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/165766 · Cited by 673
Destruction of the Galactic Globular Cluster System
Gnedin, O. Y., & Ostriker, J. P. (1997) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/303441 · Cited by 578
Star cluster ecology -- IV. Dissection of an open star cluster: photometry
Portegies Zwart, S. F., McMillan, S. L. W., Hut, P., & Makino, J. (2001) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.03976.x · Cited by 379
Cited by
Globular clusters as the relics of regular star formation in ‘normal’ high-redshift galaxies
Kruijssen, J. M. D. (2015) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2026 · Cited by 318
What controls star formation in the central 500 pc of the Galaxy?
Kruijssen, J. M. D., Longmore, S. N., Elmegreen, B. G., Murray, N., Bally, J., Testi, L., & Kennicutt, R. C. (2014) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stu494 · Cited by 288
Pfeffer, J., Kruijssen, J. M. D., Crain, R. A., & Bastian, N. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx3124 · Cited by 243
Metadata
- Authors
- Gieles, M., Zwart, S. F. P., Baumgardt, H., Athanassoula, E., Lamers, H. J. G. L. M., Sipior, M., & Leenaarts, J.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-09-11
- Volume
- 371
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 793-804
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W1973505814
- Cited by
- 278
- References
- 28
- FWCI
- 12.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Star cluster disruption by giant molecular clouds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10711.x
- The paper
- Gieles, M., Zwart, S. F. P., Baumgardt, H., Athanassoula, E., Lamers, H. J. G. L. M., Sipior, M., & Leenaarts, J. (2006). Star cluster disruption by giant molecular clouds. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10711.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.