The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The effect of red noise on planetary transit detection
Open accessAbstract
Since the discovery of short-period exoplanets a decade ago, photometric surveys have been recognized as a feasible method to detect transiting hot Jupiters. Many transit surveys are now underway, with instruments ranging from 10-cm cameras to the Hubble Space Telescope. However, the results of these surveys have been much below the expected capacity, estimated in the dozens of detections per year. One of the reasons is the presence of systematics (‘red noise’) in photometric time-series. In general, yield predictions assume uncorrelated noise (‘white noise’). In this paper, we show that the effect of red noise on the detection threshold and the expected yields cannot be neglected in typical ground-based surveys. We develop a simple method to determine the effect of red noise on photometric planetary transit detections. This method can be applied to determine detection thresholds for transit surveys. We show that the detection threshold in the presence of systematics can be much higher than that with the assumption of white noise, and obeys a different dependence on magnitude, orbital period and the parameters of the survey. Our method can also be used to estimate the significance level of a planetary transit candidate (to select promising candidates for spectroscopic follow-up). We apply our method to the OGLE planetary transit search, and show that it provides a reliable description of the actual detection threshold with real correlated noise. We point out in what way the presence of red noise could be at least partly responsible for the dearth of transiting planet detections from existing surveys, and examine some possible adaptations in survey planning and strategy. Finally, we estimate the photometric stability necessary to the detection of transiting ‘hot Neptunes’.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Detection of Planetary Transits Across a Sun-like Star
Charbonneau, D., Brown, T. M., Latham, D. W., & Mayor, M. (2000) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/312457 · Cited by 1,415
A box-fitting algorithm in the search for periodic transits
Kovács, G., Zucker, S., & Mazeh, T. (2002) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20020802 · Cited by 995 · cited 1×
“Our approach bears similarities with that of Jenkins et al. (2002), Kovács et al. (2002) and Sirko & Paczyński (2003), in accounting for the systematics in the noise by studying the properties of the photometric time-series over longer time-intervals.”
ResultSelf-citationCorrecting systematic effects in a large set of photometric light curves
Tamuz, O., Mazeh, T., & Zucker, S. (2005) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08585.x · Cited by 534
Self-citation
Cited by
A continuum from clear to cloudy hot-Jupiter exoplanets without primordial water depletion
Sing, D. K., Fortney, J. J., Nikolov, N., Wakeford, H. R., Kataria, T., Evans, T. M., Aigrain, S., Ballester, G. E., Burrows, A. S., Deming, D., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature16068 · Cited by 964
Self-citationAn Improved Photometric Calibration of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Imaging Data
Padmanabhan, N., Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., Barentine, J. C., Blanton, M. R., Brewington, H. J., Gunn, J. E., Harvanek, M., Hogg, D. W., Ivezić, Ž., et al. (2008) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/524677 · Cited by 591
A map of the large day–night temperature gradient of a super-Earth exoplanet
Demory, B.-O., Gillon, M., de Wit, J., Madhusudhan, N., Bolmont, E., Heng, K., Kataria, T., Lewis, N., Hu, R., Krick, J., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature17169 · Cited by 304
Self-citationOptimized transit detection algorithm to search for periodic transits of small planets
Hippke, M., & Heller, R. (2019) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834672 · Cited by 250
Hartman, J. D., Gaudi, B. S., Holman, M. J., McLeod, B. A., Stanek, K. Z., Barranco, J. A., Pinsonneault, M. H., Meibom, S., & Kalirai, J. S. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/695/1/336 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Pont, F., Zucker, S., & Queloz, D.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-11-21
- Volume
- 373
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 231-242
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2160374032
- Cited by
- 550
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 20.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effect of red noise on planetary transit detection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11012.x
- The paper
- Pont, F., Zucker, S., & Queloz, D. (2006). The effect of red noise on planetary transit detection. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11012.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.