Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 289

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 84 of the 84 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A kinematical approach to dark energy studies

Open access
Rapetti, David, Allen, Steven W., Amin, Mustafa A., Blandford, Roger D.·2007·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

We present and employ a new kinematical approach to cosmological ‘dark energy’ studies. We construct models in terms of the dimensionless second and third derivatives of the scalefactor a(t) with respect to cosmic time t, namely the present-day value of the deceleration parameter q0 and the cosmic jerk parameter, j(t). An elegant feature of this parametrization is that all Λ cold dark matter (ΛCDM) models have j(t) = 1 (constant), which facilitates simple tests for departures from the ΛCDM paradigm. Applying our model to the three best available sets of redshift-independent distance measurements, from Type Ia supernova and X-ray cluster gas mass fraction measurements, we obtain clear statistical evidence for a late-time transition from a decelerating to an accelerating phase. For a flat model with constant jerk, j(t) =j, we measure q0=−0.81 ± 0.14 and j= 2.16+0.81−0.75, results that are consistent with ΛCDM at about the 1σ confidence level. A standard ‘dynamical’ analysis of the same data, employing the Friedmann equations and modelling the dark energy as a fluid with an equation-of-state parameter, w (constant), gives Ωm= 0.306+0.042−0.040 and w=−1.15+0.14−0.18, also consistent with ΛCDM at about the 1σ level. In comparison to dynamical analyses, the kinematical approach uses a different model set and employs a minimum of prior information, being independent of any particular gravity theory. The results obtained with this new approach therefore provide important additional information and we argue that both kinematical and dynamical techniques should be employed in future dark energy studies, where possible. Our results provide further interesting support for the concordance ΛCDM paradigm.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11419.x

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 84 references

Cited by

See all 289

Metadata

Authors
Rapetti, D., Allen, S. W., Amin, M. A., & Blandford, R. D.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2007-02-05
Volume
375
Issue
4
Pages
1510-1520
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W2097183120
Cited by
289
References
84
FWCI
9.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A kinematical approach to dark energy studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11419.x
The paper
Rapetti, D., Allen, S. W., Amin, M. A., & Blandford, R. D. (2007). A kinematical approach to dark energy studies. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11419.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.