The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phase-space structure in the local dark matter distribution and its signature in direct detection experiments
Open accessAbstract
We study predictions for dark matter (DM) phase-space structure near the Sun based on high-resolution simulations of six galaxy haloes taken from the Aquarius project. The local DM density distribution is predicted to be remarkably smooth; the density at the Sun differs from the mean over a best-fitting ellipsoidal equidensity contour by less than 15 per cent at the 99.9 per cent confidence level. The local velocity distribution is also very smooth, but it differs systematically from a (multivariate) Gaussian distribution. This is not due to the presence of individual clumps or streams, but to broad features in the velocity modulus and energy distributions that are stable in both space and time and reflect the detailed assembly history of each halo. These features have a significant impact on the signals predicted for weakly interacting massive particle and axion searches. For example, weakly interacting massive particles recoil rates can deviate by ∼10 per cent from those expected from the best-fitting multivariate Gaussian models. The axion spectra in our simulations typically peak at lower frequencies than in the case of multivariate Gaussian velocity distributions. Also in this case, the spectra show significant imprints of the formation of the halo. This implies that once direct DM detection has become routine, features in the detector signal will allow us to study the DM assembly history of the Milky Way. A new field, ‘DM astronomy’, will then emerge.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Spergel, D. N., Verde, L., Peiris, H. V., Komatsu, E., Nolta, M. R., Bennett, C. L., Halpern, M., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Kogut, A., et al. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/377226 · Cited by 10,976
Cited by
Navarro, J. F., Ludlow, A., Springel, V., Wang, J., Vogelsberger, M., White, S. D. M., Jenkins, A., Frenk, C. S., & Helmi, A. (2010) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15878.x · Cited by 860
Self-citationBillard, J., Figueroa-Feliciano, E., & Strigari, L. (2014) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.89.023524 · Cited by 719
Read, J. I. (2014) · Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics · doi:10.1088/0954-3899/41/6/063101 · Cited by 489
Dark matter and cosmic structure
Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. (2012) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.201200212 · Cited by 409
Self-citationSommerfeld enhancements for thermal relic dark matter
Feng, J. L., Kaplinghat, M., & Yu, H.-B. (2010) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.82.083525 · Cited by 278
Metadata
- Authors
- Vogelsberger, M., Helmi, A., Springel, V., White, S. D. M., Wang, J., Frenk, C. S., Jenkins, A., Ludlow, A., & Navarro, J. F.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-05-11
- Volume
- 395
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 797-811
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2107931503
- Cited by
- 229
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phase-space structure in the local dark matter distribution and its signature in direct detection experiments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14630.x
- The paper
- Vogelsberger, M., Helmi, A., Springel, V., White, S. D. M., Wang, J., Frenk, C. S., Jenkins, A., Ludlow, A., & Navarro, J. F. (2009). Phase-space structure in the local dark matter distribution and its signature in direct detection experiments. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14630.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.