The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The X-ray brightest clusters of galaxies from the Massive Cluster Survey: The X-ray brightest MACS clusters
Open accessAbstract
We present a statistically complete sample of very X-ray luminous galaxy clusters detected in the MAssive Cluster Survey (MACS). This second MACS release comprises all 34 MACS clusters with nominal X-ray fluxes in excess of 2 × 10−12 erg s−1 cm−2 (0.1–2.4 keV) in the ROSAT Bright Source Catalogue; two-thirds of them are new discoveries. Extending over the redshift range from 0.3 to 0.5, this subset complements the complete sample of the 12 most distant MACS clusters (z > 0.5) published in 2007 and further exemplifies the efficacy of X-ray selection for the compilation of samples of intrinsically massive galaxy clusters. Extensive follow-up observations with Chandra/ACIS led to three additional MACS cluster candidates being eliminated as (predominantly) X-ray point sources. For another four clusters – which, however, remain in our sample of 34 – the point-source contamination was found to be about 50 per cent. The median X-ray luminosity of 1.3 × 1045 erg s−1 (0.1–2.4 keV, Chandra, within r500) of the clusters in this subsample demonstrates the power of the MACS strategy to find the most extreme and rarest clusters out to significant redshift. A comparison of the optical and X-ray data for all clusters in this release finds a wide range of morphologies with no obvious bias in favour of either relaxed or merging systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
THE CLUSTER LENSING AND SUPERNOVA SURVEY WITH HUBBLE: AN OVERVIEW
Postman, M., Coe, D., Benítez, N., Bradley, L., Broadhurst, T., Donahue, M., Ford, H., Graur, O., Graves, G., Jouvel, S., et al. (2012) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/199/2/25 · Cited by 849
Active galactic nuclei: what’s in a name?
Padovani, P., Alexander, D. M., Assef, R. J., De Marco, B., Giommi, P., Hickox, R. C., Richards, G. T., Smolčić, V., Hatziminaoglou, E., Mainieri, V., et al. (2017) · The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review · doi:10.1007/s00159-017-0102-9 · Cited by 666
The MCXC: a meta-catalogue of x-ray detected clusters of galaxies
Piffaretti, R., Arnaud, M., Pratt, G. W., Pointecouteau, E., & Melin, J.-B. (2011) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201015377 · Cited by 577
The nongravitational interactions of dark matter in colliding galaxy clusters
Harvey, D., Massey, R., Kitching, T., Taylor, A., & Tittley, E. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1261381 · Cited by 512
Planck 2015 results: XXVII. The second Planck catalogue of Sunyaev-Zeldovich sources
Planck Collaboration, Ade, P. A. R., Aghanim, N., Arnaud, M., Ashdown, M., Aumont, J., Baccigalupi, C., Banday, A. J., Barreiro, R. B., Barrena, R., et al. (2016) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525823 · Cited by 323
Metadata
- Authors
- Ebeling, H., Edge, A. C., Mantz, A., Barrett, E., Henry, J. P., Ma, C. J., & Van Speybroeck, L.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-06-22
- Volume
- 407
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 83-93
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1788284654
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The X-ray brightest clusters of galaxies from the Massive Cluster Survey: The X-ray brightest MACS clusters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16920.x
- The paper
- Ebeling, H., Edge, A. C., Mantz, A., Barrett, E., Henry, J. P., Ma, C. J., & Van Speybroeck, L. (2010). The X-ray brightest clusters of galaxies from the Massive Cluster Survey: The X-ray brightest MACS clusters. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16920.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.