Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 173

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Unveiling the origin of X-ray flares in gamma-ray bursts: GRB X-ray flares

Open access
Chincarini, G., Mao, J., Margutti, R., Bernardini, M. G., Guidorzi, C., Pasotti, F., Giannios, D., Valle, M. Della, Moretti, A., Romano, P., D'Avanzo, P., Cusumano, G., Giommi, P.·2010·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

We present an updated catalogue of 113 X-ray flares detected by Swift in the ∼33 per cent of the X-ray afterglows of gamma-ray burst (GRB).43 flares have a measured redshift.For the first time the analysis is performed in four different X-ray energy bands, allowing us to constrain the evolution of the flare temporal properties with energy.We find that flares are narrower at higher energies: their width follows a power-law relation w ∝ E -0.5 reminiscent of the prompt emission.Flares are asymmetric structures, with a decay time which is twice the rise time on average.Both time-scales linearly evolve with time, giving rise to a constant rise-to-decay ratio: this implies that both time-scales are stretched by the same factor.As a consequence, the flare width linearly evolves with time to larger values: this is a key point that clearly distinguishes the flare from the GRB prompt emission.The flare 0.3-10 keV peak luminosity decreases with time, following a power-law behaviour with large scatter: L pk ∝ t -2.7±0.5 pk .When multiple flares are present, a global softening trend is established: each flare is on average softer than the previous one.The 0.3-10 keV isotropic energy distribution is a lognormal peaked at 10 51 erg, with a possible excess at low energies.The flare average spectral energy distribution is found to be a power law with spectral energy index β ∼ 1.1.These results confirmed that the flares are tightly linked to the prompt emission.However, after considering various models we conclude that no model is currently able to account for the entire set of observations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17037.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 173

Metadata

Authors
Chincarini, G., Mao, J., Margutti, R., Bernardini, M. G., Guidorzi, C., Pasotti, F., Giannios, D., Valle, M. D., Moretti, A., Romano, P., D'Avanzo, P., Cusumano, G., & Giommi, P.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2010-07-15
Volume
406
Issue
4
Pages
2113-2148
ISSN
0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2162429752
Cited by
173
References
1
FWCI
7.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Unveiling the origin of X-ray flares in gamma-ray bursts: GRB X-ray flares. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17037.x
The paper
Chincarini, G., Mao, J., Margutti, R., Bernardini, M. G., Guidorzi, C., Pasotti, F., Giannios, D., Valle, M. D., Moretti, A., Romano, P., D'Avanzo, P., Cusumano, G., & Giommi, P. (2010). Unveiling the origin of X-ray flares in gamma-ray bursts: GRB X-ray flares. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17037.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.