Tidal truncation of circumplanetary discs
Open accessAbstract
We analyse some properties of circumplanetary discs. Flow through such discs may provide most of the mass to gas giant planets, and such discs are likely sites for the formation of regular satellites. We model these discs as accretion discs subject to the tidal forces of the central star. The tidal torques from the star remove the disc angular momentum near the disc outer edge and permit the accreting disc gas to lose angular momentum at the rate appropriate for steady accretion. Circumplanetary discs are truncated near the radius where periodic ballistic orbits cross, where tidal forces on the disc are strong. This radius occurs at approximately 0.4rH for the planet Hill radius rH. During the T Tauri stage of disc accretion, the disc is fairly thick with aspect ratio H/r≳ 0.2 and the disc edge tapering occurs over a radial scale ∼H∼ 0.1rH. The disc fluid equations can be rescaled in the Hill approximation to a form similar to the flow equations for a disc in a binary star system with a mass ratio of unity. For a circular or slightly eccentric orbit planet, no significant resonances lie within the main body of the disc. Tidally driven waves involving resonances none the less play an important role in truncating the disc, especially when it is fairly thick. We model the disc structure using one-dimensional time-dependent and steady-state models and also two-dimensional smoothed particle hydrodynamics simulations. The circumplanetary disc structure depends on the variation of the disc turbulent viscosity with radius and is insensitive to the angular distribution of the accreting gas. Dead zones may occur within the circumplanetary disc and result in density structures. If the disc is turbulent throughout, the predicted disc structure near the location of the regular Jovian and Saturnian satellites is smooth with no obvious feature that would favour formation at their current locations. It may be possible that substructure, such as due to variations in the disc turbulence, could lead to the trapping of migrating satellites.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Martin & Lubow (2011) suggest a tidal truncation limit of ξ ~0.4 and hydrodynamic simulations find ξ ~0.3.
“Martin & Lubow (2011) suggest a tidal truncation limit of ξ ∼ 0 . 4 and hydrodynamic simulations of planets in circumstellar disks find ξ ∼ 0 . 3 (Quillen & Trilling 1998; Ayliffe & Bate 2009).”
From Mass and period limits on the ringed companion transiting the young star J1407 (2015) · cites this paper as Martin & Lubow 2011
Estimates of the size ratio ξ for circumplanetary disks range from about 0.1 to about 0.4.
“Based on a centripetal radius argument, Quillen & Trilling (1998) estimated that an accreting circumplanetary disk would have ξ = 1/3.Hydrodynamic simulations of planets embedded in circumstellar disks also can find ξ ∼ 0.3 (Ayliffe & Bate 2009).A tidal truncation argument suggests ξ ∼ 0.4 (Martin & Lubow 2011).Theoretical models for Jupiter's circumplanetary disk accounting for Galilean satellite”
From PLANETARY CONSTRUCTION ZONES IN OCCULTATION: DISCOVERY OF AN EXTRASOLAR RING SYSTEM TRANSITING A YOUNG SUN-LIKE STAR AND FUTURE PROSPECTS FOR DETECTING ECLIPSES BY CIRCUMSECONDARY AND CIRCUMPLANETARY DISKS (2012) · cites this paper as Martin & Lubow 2011
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Formation of the Galilean Satellites: Conditions of Accretion
Canup, R. M., & Ward, W. R. (2002) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/344684 · Cited by 433 · cited 19× · see citing works
“This fact has motivated a dynamical explanation in terms of circumplanetary disc sizes (e.g. Canup & Ward 2002; Mosqueira & Estrada 2003).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialAyliffe, B. A., & Bate, M. R. (2009) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15002.x · Cited by 167 · see citing works
CIRCUMPLANETARY DISK FORMATION
Ward, W. R., & Canup, R. M. (2010) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-6256/140/5/1168 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Do Proto‐jovian Planets Drive Outflows?
Quillen, A. C., & Trilling, D. E. (1998) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/306421 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Estrada P. R., Mosqueira I. L., Jack J., D'Angelo G., Cruikshank D. P., 2008, preprint (arXiv:0809.1418) · arXiv
- Frank J., King A., Raine D., 2002, Accretion Power in Astrophysics. Cam- bridge Univ. Press, Cambridge
- Lin D. N. C., Pringle J. E., 1976, in Eggleton P. P., Mitton S., Whelan J., eds, Proc. IAU Symp. 73, Structure and Evolution of Close Binary Systems. Reidel, Dordrecht, p. 237
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mamajek, E. E., Quillen, A. C., Pecaut, M. J., Moolekamp, F., Scott, E. L., Kenworthy, M. A., Cameron, A. C., & Parley, N. R. (2012) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-6256/143/3/72 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
“A tidal truncation argument suggests ξ ∼ 0.4 (Martin & Lubow 2011).”
BackgroundInfluentialMass and period limits on the ringed companion transiting the young star J1407
Kenworthy, M. A., Lacour, S., Kraus, A., Triaud, A. H. M. J., Mamajek, E. E., Scott, E. L., Ségransan, D., Ireland, M., Hambsch, F.-J., Reichart, D. E., et al. (2015) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2067 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
“Martin & Lubow (2011) suggest a tidal truncation limit of ξ ∼ 0.4 and hydrodynamic simulations of planets in circumstellar disks find ξ ∼ 0.3 (Quillen & Trilling 1998; Ayliffe & Bate 2009).”
BackgroundInfluentialExtended transiting discs and rings around planets and brown dwarfs: theoretical constraints
Zanazzi, J. J., & Lai, D. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2629 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
- Authors
- Martin, R. G., & Lubow, S. H.
- Affiliations
- Space Telescope Science Institute (US)
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-02-16
- Volume
- 413
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1447-1461
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1812998864
- Cited by
- 134
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 6.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NNX07AI72G)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Keywords
- circumplanetary discs, tidal truncation, tidal torque, gas giant planet formation, Hill radius, disc aspect ratio, tidal resonance, disc turbulence, dead zone, disc substructures
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review