Cited by 205Dark Matter and Cosmic PhenomenaAstrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsStellar, planetary, and galactic studies

The OGLE view of microlensing towards the Magellanic Clouds - IV. OGLE-III SMC data and final conclusions on MACHOs★: The OGLE-III view of microlensing towards the SMC

Open access
Wyrzykowski, L., Skowron, J., Kozłowski, S., Udalski, A., Szymański, M. K., Kubiak, M., Pietrzyński, G., Soszyński, I. +4 more·2011·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

In this fourth part of the series presenting the Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment (OGLE) microlensing studies of the dark matter halo compact objects (MACHOs) we describe results of the OGLE-III monitoring of the Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC). Three sound candidates for microlensing events were found and yielded the optical depth tau_SMC-OIII=1.30+-1.01 10^{-7}, consistent with the expected contribution from Galactic disk and SMC self-lensing. We report that event OGLE-SMC-03 is the most likely a thick disk lens candidate, the first of such type found towards the SMC. In this paper we also combined all OGLE Large and Small Magellanic Cloud microlensing results in order to refine the conclusions on MACHOs. All but one of OGLE events are most likely caused by the lensing by known populations of stars, therefore we concluded that there is no need for introducing any special dark matter compact objects in order to explain the observed events rates. Potential black hole event indicates that similar lenses can contribute only about 2 per cent to the total mass of the halo, which is still in agreement with the expected number of such objects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19243.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The framework yields testable predictions-such as primordial black-hole population and gravitational-wave backgrounds-that distinguish it observationally from both ΛCDM and other cyclic cosmologies.

    “Moreover, the framework yields testable predictions—such as primordial black-hole population [20,21] and gravitational-wave backgrounds—that distinguish it observationally from both ΛCDM and other cyclic cosmologies [22].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wyrzykowski, L., Skowron, J., Kozłowski, S., Udalski, A., Szymański, M. K., Kubiak, M., Pietrzyński, G., Soszyński, I., Szewczyk, O., Ulaczyk, K., Poleski, R., & Tisserand, P.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2011-08-16
Volume
416
Issue
4
Pages
2949-2961
ISSN
0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2127824069
Cited by
205
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Keywords
gravitational microlensing, MACHOs, dark matter halos, Small Magellanic Cloud, OGLE-III, compact stars

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review