Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 193

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A robust sample of galaxies at redshifts 6.0<z<8.7: stellar populations, star formation rates and stellar masses: A robust sample of galaxies at 6.0 < z < 8.7

Open access
McLure, R. J., Dunlop, J. S., de Ravel, L., Cirasuolo, M., Ellis, R. S., Schenker, M., Robertson, B. E., Koekemoer, A. M., Stark, D. P., Bowler, R. A. A.·2011·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

We present the results of a photometric redshift analysis designed to identify z≥ 6 galaxies from the near-infrared Hubble Space Telescope imaging in three deep fields [Hubble Ultra Deep Field (HUDF), HUDF09-2 and Early Release Science] covering a total area of 45 square arcmin. By adopting a rigorous set of criteria for rejecting low-redshift interlopers, and by employing a deconfusion technique to allow the available ultradeep IRAC imaging to be included in the candidate-selection process, we have derived a robust sample of 70 Lyman break galaxies (LBGs) spanning the redshift range 6.0 < z < 8.7. Based on our final sample, we investigate the distribution of ultraviolet (UV) spectral slopes (fλ∝λβ), finding a variance-weighted mean value of 〈β〉=−2.05 ± 0.09 which, contrary to some previous results, is not significantly bluer than displayed by lower redshift starburst galaxies. We confirm the correlation between UV luminosity and stellar mass reported elsewhere, but based on fitting galaxy templates featuring a range of star formation histories (SFHs), metallicities and reddening, we find that, at z≥ 6, the range in mass-to-light ratio (M★/LUV) at a given UV luminosity could span a factor of ≃50. Focusing on a subsample of 21 candidates with IRAC detections at m, we find that L★ LBGs at z≃ 6.5 have a median stellar mass of M★= (2.1 ± 1.1) × 109 M⊙ (Chabrier initial mass function) and a median specific star formation rate (sSFR) of 1.9 ± 0.8 Gyr−1. Using the same subsample, we have investigated the influence of nebular continuum and line emission, finding that for the majority of candidates (16 out of 21), the best-fitting stellar masses are reduced by less than a factor of 2.5. However, galaxy template fits exploring a plausible range of SFHs and metallicities provide no compelling evidence of a clear connection between SFR and stellar mass at these redshifts. Finally, a detailed comparison of our final sample with the results of previous studies suggests that, at faint magnitudes, several high-redshift galaxy samples in the literature are significantly contaminated by low-redshift interlopers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19626.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 193

Metadata

Authors
McLure, R. J., Dunlop, J. S., de Ravel, L., Cirasuolo, M., Ellis, R. S., Schenker, M., Robertson, B. E., Koekemoer, A. M., Stark, D. P., & Bowler, R. A. A.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2011-11-08
Volume
418
Issue
3
Pages
2074-2105
ISSN
0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2103523979
Cited by
193
References
1
FWCI
16.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A robust sample of galaxies at redshifts 6.0<z<8.7: stellar populations, star formation rates and stellar masses: A robust sample of galaxies at 6.0 < z < 8.7. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19626.x
The paper
McLure, R. J., Dunlop, J. S., de Ravel, L., Cirasuolo, M., Ellis, R. S., Schenker, M., Robertson, B. E., Koekemoer, A. M., Stark, D. P., & Bowler, R. A. A. (2011). A robust sample of galaxies at redshifts 6.0<z<8.7: stellar populations, star formation rates and stellar masses: A robust sample of galaxies at 6.0 < z < 8.7. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19626.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.