Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 558

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 97 of the 97 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

NEW CONSTRAINTS ON COSMIC REIONIZATION FROM THE 2012 HUBBLE ULTRA DEEP FIELD CAMPAIGN

Open access
Robertson, Brant E., Furlanetto, Steven R., Schneider, Evan, Charlot, Stephane, Ellis, Richard S., Stark, Daniel P., McLure, Ross J., Dunlop, James S., Koekemoer, Anton, Schenker, Matthew A., Ouchi, Masami, Ono, Yoshiaki, Curtis-Lake, Emma, Rogers, Alexander B., Bowler, Rebecca A. A., Cirasuolo, Michele·2013·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

Understanding cosmic reionization requires the identification and characterization of early sources of hydrogen-ionizing photons. The 2012 Hubble Ultra Deep Field (UDF12) campaign has acquired the deepest infrared images with the Wide Field Camera 3 aboard Hubble Space Telescope and, for the first time, systematically explored the galaxy population deep into the era when cosmic microwave background (CMB) data indicate reionization was underway. The UDF12 campaign thus provides the best constraints to date on the abundance, luminosity distribution, and spectral properties of early star-forming galaxies. We synthesize the new UDF12 results with the most recent constraints from CMB observations to infer redshift-dependent ultraviolet (UV) luminosity densities, reionization histories, and electron scattering optical depth evolution consistent with the available data. Under reasonable assumptions about the escape fraction of hydrogen-ionizing photons and the intergalactic medium clumping factor, we find that to fully reionize the universe by redshift z ∼ 6 the population of star-forming galaxies at redshifts z ∼ 7–9 likely must extend in luminosity below the UDF12 limits to absolute UV magnitudes of M UV ∼ −13 or fainter. Moreover, low levels of star formation extending to redshifts z ∼ 15–25, as suggested by the normal UV colors of z ≃ 7–8 galaxies and the smooth decline in abundance with redshift observed by UDF12 to z ≃ 10, are additionally likely required to reproduce the optical depth to electron scattering inferred from CMB observations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0004-637x/768/1/71

Cites

97 of 97 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 97 references

Cited by

See all 558

Metadata

Authors
Robertson, B. E., Furlanetto, S. R., Schneider, E., Charlot, S., Ellis, R. S., Stark, D. P., McLure, R. J., Dunlop, J. S., Koekemoer, A., Schenker, M. A., Ouchi, M., Ono, Y., Curtis-Lake, E., Rogers, A. B., Bowler, R. A. A., & Cirasuolo, M.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2013-04-16
Volume
768
Issue
1
Pages
71
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2034960857
Cited by
558
References
97
FWCI
37.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: NEW CONSTRAINTS ON COSMIC REIONIZATION FROM THE 2012 HUBBLE ULTRA DEEP FIELD CAMPAIGN. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/768/1/71
The paper
Robertson, B. E., Furlanetto, S. R., Schneider, E., Charlot, S., Ellis, R. S., Stark, D. P., McLure, R. J., Dunlop, J. S., Koekemoer, A., Schenker, M. A., Ouchi, M., Ono, Y., Curtis-Lake, E., Rogers, A. B., Bowler, R. A. A., & Cirasuolo, M. (2013). NEW CONSTRAINTS ON COSMIC REIONIZATION FROM THE 2012 HUBBLE ULTRA DEEP FIELD CAMPAIGN. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/768/1/71

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.