Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 170

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The dynamical state of stellar structure in star-forming regions: Dynamical state of star-forming regions

Open access
Kruijssen, J. M. Diederik, Maschberger, Thomas, Moeckel, Nickolas, Clarke, Cathie J., Bastian, Nate, Bonnell, Ian A.·2012·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

The fraction of star formation that results in bound star clusters is influenced by the density spectrum in which stars are formed and by the response of the stellar structure to gas expulsion. We analyse hydrodynamical simulations of turbulent fragmentation in star-forming regions to assess the dynamical properties of the resulting population of stars and (sub)clusters. Stellar subclusters are identified using a minimum spanning tree algorithm. When considering only the gravitational potential of the stars and ignoring the gas, we find that the identified subclusters are close to virial equilibrium (the typical virial ratio Qvir≈ 0.59, where virial equilibrium would be Qvir∼ 0.5). This virial state is a consequence of the low gas fractions within the subclusters, caused by the accretion of gas on to the stars and the accretion-induced shrinkage of the subclusters. Because the subclusters are gas poor, up to a length-scale of 0.1–0.2 pc at the end of the simulation, they are only weakly affected by gas expulsion. The fraction of subclusters that reaches the high density required to evolve to a gas-poor state increases with the density of the star-forming region. We extend this argument to star cluster scales, and suggest that the absence of gas indicates that the early disruption of star clusters due to gas expulsion (infant mortality) plays a smaller role than anticipated, and is potentially restricted to star-forming regions with low ambient gas densities. We propose that in dense star-forming regions, the tidal shocking of young star clusters by the surrounding gas clouds could be responsible for the early disruption. This ‘cruel cradle effect’ would work in addition to disruption by gas expulsion. We suggest possible methods to quantify the relative contributions of both mechanisms.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19748.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 170

Metadata

Authors
Kruijssen, J. M. D., Maschberger, T., Moeckel, N., Clarke, C. J., Bastian, N., & Bonnell, I. A.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2011-11-03
Volume
419
Issue
1
Pages
841-853
ISSN
0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1776406192
Cited by
170
References
0
FWCI
6.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The dynamical state of stellar structure in star-forming regions: Dynamical state of star-forming regions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19748.x
The paper
Kruijssen, J. M. D., Maschberger, T., Moeckel, N., Clarke, C. J., Bastian, N., & Bonnell, I. A. (2012). The dynamical state of stellar structure in star-forming regions: Dynamical state of star-forming regions. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19748.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.