The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Planetary evaporation by UV and X-ray radiation: basic hydrodynamics
Open accessAbstract
We consider the evaporation of close-in planets by the star's intrinsic extreme-ultraviolet (EUV) and X-ray radiation. We calculate evaporation rates by solving the hydrodynamical problem for planetary evaporation including heating from both X-ray and EUV radiation. We show that most close-in planets (a < 0.1 au) are evaporating hydrodynamically, with the evaporation occurring in two distinct regimes: X-ray driven, in which the X-ray heated flow contains a sonic point, and EUV driven, in which the X-ray region is entirely sub-sonic. The mass-loss rates scale as LX/a2 for X-ray driven evaporation, and as for EUV driven evaporation at early times, with mass-loss rates of the order of 1010–1014 g s−1. No exact scaling exists for the mass-loss rate with planet mass and planet radius; however, in general evaporation proceeds more rapidly for planets with lower densities and higher masses. Furthermore, we find that in general the transition from X-ray driven to EUV driven evaporation occurs at lower X-ray luminosities for planets closer to their parent stars and for planets with lower densities. Coupling our evaporation models to the evolution of the high-energy radiation – which falls with time – we are able to follow the evolution of evaporating planets. We find that most planets start off evaporating in the X-ray driven regime, but switch to EUV driven once the X-ray luminosity falls below a critical value. The evolution models suggest that while ‘hot Jupiters’ are evaporating, they are not evaporating at a rate sufficient to remove the entire gaseous envelope on Gyr time-scales. However, we do find that close in Neptune mass planets are more susceptible to complete evaporation of their envelopes. Thus we conclude that planetary evaporation is more important for lower mass planets, particularly those in the ‘hot Neptune’/‘super Earth’ regime.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mannings, V (2000) · Icarus · doi:10.1006/icar.1999.6299 · Cited by 4,151
Dynamics of the Interplanetary Gas and Magnetic Fields.
Parker, E. N. (1958) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/146579 · Cited by 3,643
Physical Processes in the Interstellar Medium
Spitzer, L. (1998) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9783527617722 · Cited by 2,090
Physical Processes in the Interstellar Medium
King, A. R. (1979) · Physics Bulletin · doi:10.1088/0031-9112/30/5/027 · Cited by 1,332
Photodissociation regions. I - Basic model. II - A model for the Orion photodissociation region
Tielens, A. G. G. M., & Hollenbach, D. (1985) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/163111 · Cited by 1,256
An extended upper atmosphere around the extrasolar planet HD209458b
Vidal-Madjar, A., des Etangs, A. L., Désert, J.-M., Ballester, G. E., Ferlet, R., Hébrard, G., & Mayor, M. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01448 · Cited by 1,208 · cited 8×
“Penz et al. (2008) considered the evolution of hot Jupiter’s similar to HD209458b and found total mass-loss over Gyr’s of evolution higher than found here, this is similar to the results of certain cases in the Jackson et al. (2012) models for pure X-ray evaporation.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialThe stellar-activity-rotation relationship and the evolution of stellar dynamos
Wright, N. J., Drake, J. J., Mamajek, E. E., & Henry, G. W. (2011) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/743/1/48 · Cited by 882
Ribas, I., Guinan, E. F., Gudel, M., & Audard, M. (2005) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/427977 · Cited by 855
Atmospheric escape from hot Jupiters
Murray-Clay, R. A., Chiang, E. I., & Murray, N. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/693/1/23 · Cited by 723
Defining and cataloging exoplanets: the exoplanet.eu database
Schneider, J., Dedieu, C., Le Sidaner, P., Savalle, R., & Zolotukhin, I. (2011) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201116713 · Cited by 657
Cited by
UNDERSTANDING THE MASS-RADIUS RELATION FOR SUB-NEPTUNES: RADIUS AS A PROXY FOR COMPOSITION
Lopez, E. D., & Fortney, J. J. (2014) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/792/1/1 · Cited by 722
Extreme Water Loss and Abiotic O 2 Buildup on Planets Throughout the Habitable Zones of M Dwarfs
Luger, R., & Barnes, R. (2015) · Astrobiology · doi:10.1089/ast.2014.1231 · Cited by 585
DENSITY AND ECCENTRICITY OF KEPLER PLANETS
Wu, Y., & Lithwick, Y. (2013) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/772/1/74 · Cited by 231
Outgassing History and Escape of the Martian Atmosphere and Water Inventory
Lammer, H., Chassefière, E., Karatekin, Ö., Morschhauser, A., Niles, P. B., Mousis, O., Odert, P., Möstl, U. V., Breuer, D., Dehant, V., et al. (2013) · Space Science Reviews · doi:10.1007/s11214-012-9943-8 · Cited by 180
Water contents of Earth-mass planets around M dwarfs
Tian, F., & Ida, S. (2015) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/ngeo2372 · Cited by 162
Metadata
- Authors
- Owen, J. E., & Jackson, A. P.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-09-05
- Volume
- 425
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2931-2947
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2166854848
- Cited by
- 435
- References
- 52
- FWCI
- 10.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Planetary evaporation by UV and X-ray radiation: basic hydrodynamics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21481.x
- The paper
- Owen, J. E., & Jackson, A. P. (2012). Planetary evaporation by UV and X-ray radiation: basic hydrodynamics. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21481.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.