The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Solar system constraints on f(T) gravity
Open accessAbstract
We use recent observations of Solar system orbital motions in order to constrain f(T) gravity. In particular, imposing a quadratic f(T) correction to the linear-in-T form, which is a good approximation for every realistic case, we extract the spherical solutions of the theory. Using these spherical solutions to describe the Sun's gravitational field, we use recently determined supplementary advances of planetary perihelia, to infer upper bounds on the allowed f(T) corrections. We find that the maximal allowed divergence of the gravitational potential in f(T) gravity from that in the teleparallel equivalent of General Relativity is of the order of 6.2 × 10−10, in the applicability region of our analysis. This is much smaller than the corresponding (significantly small too) divergence that is predicted from cosmological observations, as expected. Such a tiny allowed divergence from the linear form should be taken into account in f(T) model building.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant
Riess, A. G., Filippenko, A. V., Challis, P., Clocchiatti, A., Diercks, A., Garnavich, P. M., Gilliland, R. L., Hogan, C. J., Jha, S., Kirshner, R. P., et al. (1998) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/300499 · Cited by 19,704
Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 High‐Redshift Supernovae
Perlmutter, S., Aldering, G., Goldhaber, G., Knop, R. A., Nugent, P., Castro, P. G., Deustua, S., Fabbro, S., Goobar, A., Groom, D. E., et al. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/307221 · Cited by 18,062
Cosmological consequences of a rolling homogeneous scalar field
Ratra, B., & Peebles, P. J. E. (1988) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.37.3406 · Cited by 4,310 · cited 1×
“…in the right-hand-side of the field equations of General Relativity, which could either beth simple cosmological constant or various new exotic ingredients (Ratra & Peebles (1988), Wetterich (1988), Caldwell (2002), Nojiri & Odintsov (2003), Feng et al.(2005), Guo (2005), Cai et al. (2010)).”
BackgroundThe Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment
Will, C. M. (2006) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2006-3 · Cited by 1,606
Cited by
Modified gravity theories on a nutshell: Inflation, bounce and late-time evolution
Nojiri, S., Odintsov, S. D., & Oikonomou, V. K. (2017) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.06.001 · Cited by 2,734
Metadata
- Authors
- Iorio, L., & Saridakis, E. N.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-11-19
- Volume
- 427
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1555-1561
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W1892541072
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 12.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Solar system constraints on f(T) gravity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21995.x
- The paper
- Iorio, L., & Saridakis, E. N. (2012). Solar system constraints on f(T) gravity. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21995.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.