The DOI matches its Crossref record.
High‐resolution manometry in clinical practice: utilizing pressure topography to classify oesophageal motility abnormalities
Open accessAbstract
Abstract High‐resolution manometry capable of pressure monitoring from the pharynx to the stomach together with pressure topography plotting represents an unquestionable evolution in oesophageal manometry. However, with this advanced technology come challenges and one of those is devising the optimal scheme to apply high‐resolution oesophageal pressure topography (HROPT) to the clinical evaluation of patients. The first iteration of the Chicago classification was based on a systematic analysis of motility patterns in 75 control subjects and 400 consecutive patients. This review summarizes the analysis process as it has evolved. Individual swallows are analysed in a stepwise fashion for the morphology of the oesophagogastric junction (OGJ), the extent of OGJ relaxation, the propagation velocity of peristalsis, the vigour of the peristaltic contraction, and abnormalities of intrabolus pressure utilizing metrics that have now been customized to HROPT. These results are then synthesized into a comprehensive diagnosis that, although based on conventional manometry criteria, is also customized to HROPT measures. The resultant classification objectifies the identification of three unique subtypes of achalasia. Additionally, it provides enhanced detail in the description of distal oesophageal spasm, nutcracker oesophagus subtypes, and OGJ obstruction. It is our expectation that modification of this classification scheme will continue to occur and this should further clarify the utility of pressure topography plotting in assessing oesophageal motility disorders.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Esophageal motility disorders on high‐resolution manometry: Chicago classification version 4.0©
Yadlapati, R., Kahrilas, P. J., Fox, M. R., Bredenoord, A. J., Prakash Gyawali, C., Roman, S., Babaei, A., Mittal, R. K., Rommel, N., Savarino, E., et al. (2021) · Neurogastroenterology & Motility · doi:10.1111/nmo.14058 · Cited by 1,080
Self-citationThe 2018 ISDE achalasia guidelines
Zaninotto, G., Bennett, C., Boeckxstaens, G., Costantini, M., Ferguson, M. K., Pandolfino, J. E., Patti, M. G., Ribeiro, U., Richter, J., Swanstrom, L., et al. (2018) · Diseases of the Esophagus · doi:10.1093/dote/doy071 · Cited by 357
Self-citationFundamentals of Neurogastroenterology: Physiology/Motility – Sensation
Boeckxstaens, G., Camilleri, M., Sifrim, D., Houghton, L. A., Elsenbruch, S., Lindberg, G., Azpiroz, F., & Parkman, H. P. (2016) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.030 · Cited by 142
Automated Chicago Classification for esophageal motility disorder diagnosis using machine learning
Surdea-Blaga, T., Sebestyen, G., Czako, Z., Hangan, A., Dumitrascu, D. L., Ismaiel, A., David, L., Zsigmond, I., Chiarioni, G., Savarino, E., et al. (2022) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s22145227 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Pandolfino, J. E., Fox, M. R., Bredenoord, A. J., & Kahrilas, P. J.
- Venue
- Neurogastroenterology & Motility
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-07-09
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 796-806
- ISSN
- 1350-1925 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2982
- OpenAlex
- W2094191681
- Cited by
- 327
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High‐resolution manometry in clinical practice: utilizing pressure topography to classify oesophageal motility abnormalities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2982.2009.01311.x
- The paper
- Pandolfino, J. E., Fox, M. R., Bredenoord, A. J., & Kahrilas, P. J. (2009). High‐resolution manometry in clinical practice: utilizing pressure topography to classify oesophageal motility abnormalities. Neurogastroenterology & Motility. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2982.2009.01311.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.