The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Chicago classification criteria of esophageal motility disorders defined in high resolution esophageal pressure topography1
Open accessAbstract
Background The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility was developed to facilitate the interpretation of clinical high resolution esophageal pressure topography (EPT) studies, concurrent with the widespread adoption of this technology into clinical practice. The Chicago Classification has been an evolutionary process, molded first by published evidence pertinent to the clinical interpretation of high resolution manometry (HRM) studies and secondarily by group experience when suitable evidence is lacking. Purpose This publication summarizes the state of our knowledge as of the most recent meeting of the International High Resolution Manometry Working Group in Ascona, Switzerland in April 2011. The prior iteration of the Chicago Classification was updated through a process of literature analysis and discussion. The major changes in this document from the prior iteration are largely attributable to research studies published since the prior iteration, in many cases research conducted in response to prior deliberations of the International High Resolution Manometry Working Group. The classification now includes criteria for subtyping achalasia, EGJ outflow obstruction, motility disorders not observed in normal subjects (Distal esophageal spasm, Hypercontractile esophagus, and Absent peristalsis), and statistically defined peristaltic abnormalities (Weak peristalsis, Frequent failed peristalsis, Rapid contractions with normal latency, and Hypertensive peristalsis). The Chicago Classification is an algorithmic scheme for diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders from clinical EPT studies. Moving forward, we anticipate continuing this process with increased emphasis placed on natural history studies and outcome data based on the classification.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Esophageal motility disorders on high‐resolution manometry: Chicago classification version 4.0©
Yadlapati, R., Kahrilas, P. J., Fox, M. R., Bredenoord, A. J., Prakash Gyawali, C., Roman, S., Babaei, A., Mittal, R. K., Rommel, N., Savarino, E., et al. (2021) · Neurogastroenterology & Motility · doi:10.1111/nmo.14058 · Cited by 1,080
Self-citationTakizawa, C., Gemmell, E., Kenworthy, J., & Speyer, R. (2016) · Dysphagia · doi:10.1007/s00455-016-9695-9 · Cited by 532
Fundamentals of Neurogastroenterology: Physiology/Motility – Sensation
Boeckxstaens, G., Camilleri, M., Sifrim, D., Houghton, L. A., Elsenbruch, S., Lindberg, G., Azpiroz, F., & Parkman, H. P. (2016) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.030 · Cited by 142
Metadata
- Authors
- Bredenoord, A. J., Fox, M., Kahrilas, P. J., Pandolfino, J. E., Schwizer, W., Smout, A. J. P. M., & The International High Resolution Manometry Working Group
- Venue
- Neurogastroenterology & Motility
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-01-16
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- s1
- Pages
- 57-65
- ISSN
- 1350-1925 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2982
- OpenAlex
- W2136491277
- Cited by
- 775
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 84.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chicago classification criteria of esophageal motility disorders defined in high resolution esophageal pressure topography1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2982.2011.01834.x
- The paper
- Bredenoord, A. J., Fox, M., Kahrilas, P. J., Pandolfino, J. E., Schwizer, W., Smout, A. J. P. M., & The International High Resolution Manometry Working Group. (2012). Chicago classification criteria of esophageal motility disorders defined in high resolution esophageal pressure topography1. Neurogastroenterology & Motility. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2982.2011.01834.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.